@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agotop textsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up1260arrow-down136
arrow-up1224arrow-down1imagetop textsh.itjust.works@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square14fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish75•1 year agoSounds like a business that shouldn’t be privately owned but just be a part of the military.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•1 year agoEither by paying up and shutting up or by owning the factories themselves you’d lose a bunch of money, so not sure that’s the way to tackle it
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish37•1 year agoI mean, paying billions for things that will probably never be used in any meaningful capacity is not a foreign concept to the military. They do it all the time.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish26•1 year agoThat is literally the BEST case outcome for military spending.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish8•1 year agoIt’s second best. The best is not paying and never needing it.
Sounds like a business that shouldn’t be privately owned but just be a part of the military.
Either by paying up and shutting up or by owning the factories themselves you’d lose a bunch of money, so not sure that’s the way to tackle it
I mean, paying billions for things that will probably never be used in any meaningful capacity is not a foreign concept to the military. They do it all the time.
That is literally the BEST case outcome for military spending.
It’s second best. The best is not paying and never needing it.