The higher the number, the greater the government’s justification for compelling polluters to reduce the emissions that are dangerously heating the planet. During the Obama administration, White House economists calculated the social cost of carbon at $42 a ton. The Trump administration lowered it to less than $5 a ton. Under President Biden, the cost was returned to Obama levels, adjusted for inflation and set at $51.

The new estimate of the social cost of carbon, making its debut in a legally binding federal regulation, is almost four times that amount: $190 a ton.

  • @EatYouWell
    link
    810 months ago

    There are plenty of electric cars under $40k these days. And guess what? If the demand rises, then economy versions will be released.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      110 months ago

      I was able to get my EV for about 33k after trade in and some haggling. It made sense for our monthly cash flow because I was still paying on the gas car though.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -410 months ago

      Plenty of electric cars under $40k? Name five good ones, ones where they don’t rattle incessantly and when you shut the door you don’t feel surrounded by a sea of the cheapest plastics (offgassing the whole time naturally). I can tell you from personal experience the Bolt isn’t a good one. And just to be clear, my standard isn’t Lexus or Maybach, I’m comparing with Honda Accord/Toyota Camry/Mazda CX-5 for interior and overall quality.

      • Funderpants
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I love this comment. It’s like ‘Yea, I want to help , but have you seen electric cars? Oh my gross! Oh well, come on kids, hope in the gas car, let me drive you to the crematorium.’

          • Funderpants
            link
            fedilink
            410 months ago

            I can’t imagine stressing about a several years old resolved recall, lol, Jesus Christ.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              010 months ago

              It’s indicative of the quality, or lack thereof, or a Bolt. Imagine having a vehicle literally declared non-operational for that nonsense and how long some customers had to wait for a fix. That’s time they don’t get to use the car they paid for, and I doubt their bosses are going to blame GM when they can’t get to work on time. Yeah, I stress about a recall like that, a car you can’t use is worthless.

              • Funderpants
                link
                fedilink
                310 months ago

                I’d guess I’d have to imagine it since that isn’t what happened with those Bolt recalls.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  010 months ago

                  My relative with the Bolt was literally warned to not drive it until they could get parts to deal with the seat belt fire (yes, that’s one of the two fire related recalls), which took almost a month. You tell me how that’s not a problem for, say, working people.

                  • Funderpants
                    link
                    fedilink
                    310 months ago

                    GM did not ask drivers to stop operating the vehicle. It was not part of the recall instructions. Another imaginary concern.

      • @EatYouWell
        link
        210 months ago

        “I had a bad experience with a single EV, so all of them must be bad.”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          110 months ago

          I think you’re misunderstanding me. I continue to say there are probably good EVs out there, the Bolt isn’t one of them. That’s all I’ve ever said, and people keep interpreting that as an attack on EVs in general. I want an affordable EV with the usable space and interior quality of my 2010 Mazda3. Is that a condemnation of all EVs, and if so, what does that say about EVs?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        210 months ago

        In case this is an actually sincere question, Hyundai kona ev can be purchased for 30k range with federal and state incentives and is fine for 90% of commuting needs and has good range for longer trips. With a child and 65 lbs dog, it’s been our primary/ only vehicle for a few years now and no real issues. Do I want a good electric van when one hits the market at a reasonable price? For sure. But if you actually want an ev for family use, there isn’t much truly stopping you.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          110 months ago

          The Hyundai/Kia offerings look interesting but the nearest dealership is 40 miles away and that’s more than I can do to go test drive a car. How’s the interior, equivalent to a Honda at least?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            210 months ago

            It’s pretty fine. Some areas are a bit cheaper build quality than I’d like but I’ve never really had any significant complaints. But I also have a relatively high tolerance–so long as it works and does its job, I’m good as far as cars go.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              110 months ago

              I don’t think of myself as picky, but large panel gaps and cheap materials like on an armrest or the seats themselves just really grate on me. When I bought my last vehicle, I test drove like 15 vehicles, and while I liked the economy of the Prius V, the places they cheaper out (no air vents for rear passengers for instance) stuck out like a sore thumb. Hopefully my next vehicle can be an EV, I just can’t square the circle of trading in a reliable, paid off car for a new EV with a monthly payment.