The former president told voters to ‘watch’ the cities

  • @jordanlundM
    link
    611 year ago

    Neither Trump, nor his supporters, have any clue what it is they are to be watching for.

    All the claimed video evidence was either people voting or election workers doing their jobs.

      • @jordanlundM
        link
        01 year ago

        If they don’t know what they’re doing, it’s not very intimidating. Sad, borderline hilarious, yes.

        • osarusan
          link
          fedilink
          281 year ago

          It’s not really hilarious if you’re in one of the groups that is regularly targeted by them…

        • Flying Squid
          link
          211 year ago

          They don’t have to do much to intimidate. Such as stand right in front of the boundary line with a rifle strapped to their back.

        • Shalakushka
          link
          fedilink
          141 year ago

          It’s intimidating because they bring guns and gangs to the polls.

        • ddh
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 year ago

          They’re watching for “them”, as in “us versus them”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      40
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Trump doesn’t want them to watch for anything. He wants a bunch of skinheads with guns loitering around the polling places intimidating poll workers and people who want to vote. And when they break polling place security laws like getting too close and police come and arrest them (if they even do that and don’t just let them break the law) then they spread videos of, look we’re just monitoring but police are hauling us away, what are they hiding at this polling place? Or even better for Trump, violence and polling places getting shut down entirely. He just wants voter suppression and chaos.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        So how do we tackle using speech that is technically ambiguous, but clearly meant to incite violence or stochastic terrorism?

          • BlanketsWithSmallpox
            link
            6
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Having courts overturn previous established restrictions on the first amendment by adding stochastic statements as a clear infraction the same way yelling Fire in a theater does.

            Stop using ‘a reasonable man’ as a tool of politic when its one of the worst bullshit scapegoats ever for lawmakers who don’t want to define shit or step on people’s toes by directly calling out what’s unreasonable, insane, fascist, or plain stupid.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      201 year ago

      Remember back in 2020 when massive crowds of MAGAs were banging on windows and trying to get in while poll workers counted votes? That’s what he is trying to get his supporters to do on a nationwide level next year.

    • Terrasque
      link
      fedilink
      121 year ago

      No no, it’s easy. If they see any dark skinned, or democrat looking people vote, they know it’s voting fraud.