@psy32nd to Lemmy Shitpost • edit-21 year agohypocrite.lockimagemessage-square159arrow-up1419arrow-down1158
arrow-up1261arrow-down1imagehypocrite.lock@psy32nd to Lemmy Shitpost • edit-21 year agomessage-square159
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•1 year agoyea. that, too, is an aesthetic issue. it can be gross without being immoral.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 year agoI think that having sex with sentient beings without their consent is extremely immoral
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agosentience and consent have nothing to do with one another.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 year agosomeone experiencing it should have a say in whether or not they experience it
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoonce again, we are going to be disagreeing on the relevant definitions of “someone”.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 year agothe experiencers should have a say in whether or not they experience it
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agothis is an impossible standard, and I don’t believe it’s one you actually ascribe to: for instance, pretty much everyone is ok with sterilizing stray dogs and cats, and there is never a question of consent.
yea. that, too, is an aesthetic issue. it can be gross without being immoral.
We disagree very strongly
you think gross things are immoral?
I think that having sex with sentient beings without their consent is extremely immoral
sentience and consent have nothing to do with one another.
someone experiencing it should have a say in whether or not they experience it
once again, we are going to be disagreeing on the relevant definitions of “someone”.
deleted by creator
the experiencers should have a say in whether or not they experience it
this is an impossible standard, and I don’t believe it’s one you actually ascribe to: for instance, pretty much everyone is ok with sterilizing stray dogs and cats, and there is never a question of consent.