Toes♀ to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 1 year agoGlitch in the matrixani.socialimagemessage-square519fedilinkarrow-up1408arrow-down119
arrow-up1389arrow-down1imageGlitch in the matrixani.socialToes♀ to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 1 year agomessage-square519fedilink
minus-square@CheesyFoxlink1•1 year agoa fair point, but aren’t division and subtraction are non-communicative, hence both operands need to be evaluated first?
minus-square@EffortlessEffluvium@lemm.eelinkfedilink3•1 year agoIt’s commutative, not communicative, btw
minus-square@Pipocalink2•edit-21 year ago1 - 3 + 1 is interpreted as (1 - 3) + 1 = -1 Yes, they’re non commutative, and you need to evaluate anything in parens first, but that’s basically a red herring here.
a fair point, but aren’t division and subtraction are non-communicative, hence both operands need to be evaluated first?
It’s commutative, not communicative, btw
whoops, my bad
1 - 3 + 1 is interpreted as (1 - 3) + 1 = -1
Yes, they’re non commutative, and you need to evaluate anything in parens first, but that’s basically a red herring here.
ok, i guess you’re right