• @tabular
    link
    English
    31 year ago

    What if account creation was local (e.g. Git and keys)?

    If no data needs to be stored then no account is needed. Use the system where there is a unique indentifier based on the password.

    • @Syrc
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      Use the system where there is a unique indentifier based on the password.

      Never heard of this, how does that work?

      • @tabular
        link
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        A tripcode "is the hashed result of a password that allows one’s identity to be recognized without storing any data about users. Entering a particular password will let one “sign” one’s posts with the tripcode generated from that password. Trying to take another user’s tripcode and compute their password from it (for instance, to make posts that appear to come from a particular person) is somewhat computationally difficult."

        • @Syrc
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          That’s pretty cool, but still, does that really solve the bot problem? Doesn’t it make it easier for them to spam?

          • @tabular
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            Tripcodes doesn’t affect bots spamming at all.

            No longer needing accounts removes whatever barrier to entry email, phone or credit card is worth. On the plus side less people are being farmed for data, so society is better off 😕

            • @Syrc
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              What I mean is, doesn’t that barrier being removed make things easier for bots as well? And while humans only save a bit of time once to register, bot farms would improve a lot considering they do it over and over again.

              Less data farming is undeniably better, but imo if something helps bringing us further from the Dead Internet outcome I can accept it. Of course, just the bare necessities, sites that require you mail + phone + name and so on when they don’t need them to function should really dial it down.

              • @tabular
                link
                English
                11 year ago

                Perhaps requiring government ID would prevent even more bots… but stopping bots is not my priority. When reading YouTube comments I see obvious comments from bots making generic comments or asking people to click links, but I also see many comments that make me wonder if they are being sincere or this is ML generated. Unless you’re going to ask for more and more personal data then only the side creating bots will advance in fooling those requirement. Barriers to entry do not appear to be a valid long-term strategy.

                • @Syrc
                  link
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  Yeah, requiring government IDs would basically solve the bot problem, but would make the internet a privacy hell, especially for nations like China which already struggle with it.

                  We need a middle ground, but it’s becoming increasingly harder to find one as you said.