Excess oxygen is actually harmful to humans, but all the climate warnings are about losing oxygen, not nitrogen edit: but when we look for habitable planets, our focus is ‘oxygen rich atmosphere’, not ‘nitrogen rich’, and in medical settings, we’re always concerned about low oxygen, not nitrogen.

Deep sea divers also use a nitrogen mix (nitrox) to stay alive and help prevent the bends, so nitrogen seems pretty important.

It seems weird that our main focus is oxygen when our main air intake is nitrogen. What am I missing?

edit: my climate example was poor and I think misleading. Added a better example instead.

  • @zeppo
    link
    English
    161 year ago

    Is there some threat to the worlds supply of atmospheric nitrogen?

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      My climate example was poor, I’m sorry. A better example of what I mean is that when we look for habitable planets, our focus is ‘oxygen rich atmosphere’, not ‘nitrogen rich’, though most of our breathable air is nitrogen and too much oxygen will actually kill us.

      • @zeppo
        link
        English
        171 year ago

        I suppose because we don’t really use the nitrogen - it’s inert, unlike oxygen which is part of vital respiration. I’m no expert but it’s conceivable some other mix of gases could work as the inert portion besides nitrogen, but oxygen is required. Seems like it would take a lot of luck to find the right concentration though.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          Calling it “inert” is misleading. It’s involved in all kinds of chemical reactions that are essential for life (and lots of non-biological reactions, too). It’s only inert in the sense that most living things can’t use it directly from the air and rely on nitrogen-fixing plants and bacteria to make it into molecules we can use.

          • @zeppo
            link
            English
            13
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Sure, I understand it’s one of the 3 basic plant fertilizers and plays a role in human biology. I’m referring nitrogen as a gas and its role in human respiration. It’s commonly referred to as an inert gas. I think that mainly refers to respiration and combustion.

        • Dharma Curious
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          Now I’m imagining a planet with a helium atmosphere that’s breathable for humans. Best. Episode. Of. Star Trek. Ever. I’m envisioning TOS, super serious scenes where Scotty has fallen near dead, Kirk looks to Bones for some reassurance, and in Mickey Mouses voice Bones mournfully tells him “He’s dead, Jim”

          • @[email protected]OP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            This needs to be an episode of Lower Decks.

            e: and Boimler’s voice doesn’t change.

          • @zeppo
            link
            English
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I think it could work? Not really sure. Probably sound enough scientifically for a 1st gen Star Trek episode.

            • roguetrick
              link
              fedilink
              5
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It would work in the sense that you could breathe it. It would not work in the sense that the gravity of a planet that actually holds a helium atmosphere (as opposed to it flying off into space) would be uncomfortable.

              • @zeppo
                link
                English
                11 year ago

                Would argon work?