They historically have that component, yes. Its like how the 1934 NFA in America was trying to keep black people from arming themselves.
Scroll down to the bit about the “The 1938 Regulations Against Jews’ Possession of Weapons, which came into force the day after Kristallnacht,[12][13] effectively deprived all Jews living under Nazi rule of the right to possess any form of weapons, including truncheons, knives, firearms and ammunition.”
Yes I’m well aware of the existence of the Nazi Party and the laws they imposed. I’m asking once again, are you implying that CURRENT laws in Germany are antisemetic?
Now I did as you said and scrolled down the article you provided. Can you do me a favor and scroll back up the article to this bit:
Why did you feel the need to ignore the current state of gun control in Germany, scroll past it and share a commonly known fact about the actions of the Nazi party nearly 100 years ago? In future maybe respond with the current context rather than a no longer relevant context which only serves to poison the well of conversation.
So once again, just to be clear; Are you implying that current laws in Germany are antisemetic?
“DNA evidence implicated 9 of the men” yet only one is going to jail.
If that was my sister… I’d probably end up in jail.
These judges/politicians are just pushing for French Revolution II.
Removed by mod
Are you implying that current laws in Germany are antisemetic?
They historically have that component, yes. Its like how the 1934 NFA in America was trying to keep black people from arming themselves.
Scroll down to the bit about the “The 1938 Regulations Against Jews’ Possession of Weapons, which came into force the day after Kristallnacht,[12][13] effectively deprived all Jews living under Nazi rule of the right to possess any form of weapons, including truncheons, knives, firearms and ammunition.”
Yes I’m well aware of the existence of the Nazi Party and the laws they imposed. I’m asking once again, are you implying that CURRENT laws in Germany are antisemetic?
Now I did as you said and scrolled down the article you provided. Can you do me a favor and scroll back up the article to this bit:
Why did you feel the need to ignore the current state of gun control in Germany, scroll past it and share a commonly known fact about the actions of the Nazi party nearly 100 years ago? In future maybe respond with the current context rather than a no longer relevant context which only serves to poison the well of conversation.
So once again, just to be clear; Are you implying that current laws in Germany are antisemetic?
If this was America. The democrats would build a statue for him.
The judge is a lady, and no they wouldn’t.
They’d make a statue of the rapist. It’s how the democrats roll.
I assume you have an example of this happening, as this is not the first bad call in a sexual assault case a judge has made.
So show me the statue.
You’ve been at least reasonable in other comments. This one doesn’t rise to that level.
I am always reasonable.