• @dwokimmortalus
    link
    English
    231 year ago

    Much of it has to do with Firefox’s decisions in the past 5-7 years that have made it very unfriendly to enterprise environments. The provisioning tools have gotten progressively more hostile to IT departments.

    The US government is also finally moving to more modern systems for authentication and Mozilla has incorporated some particularly poor changes to how the stack is handled that are very unfriendly to IT environments that need to manage credentials for multiple authoritative sources. We had to switch to Chrome a couple years ago because our support cases with Mozilla would on many occasions come back with a response of ‘we’ve made our decision and will not be considering changes’.

    Unfortunately, as Firefox kicks itself out of the enterprise market; that’s going to cascade to the personal market even further as well.

    • Venia Silente
      link
      fedilink
      English
      181 year ago

      Serious question re the auth part:

      Have you tried submitting PRs? Much of the complaints that I see about the development side of Firefox are grounded on the fac that “they won’t have this cool thing that Chrome has”, ignoring that those things are usually dangerous or are rejected for justified, studied reasons (see: WebUSB). Sounds just about the area where auth would have issues, and it’d be interesting to see what Firefox’s actual response was.

      Who knows, maybe they’re cluing you that you shouldn’t depending on Google…

      • @febra
        link
        English
        81 year ago

        Well, as much as I like Firefox (and I even donate to the Mozilla foundation), I know for a fact that companies won’t pay their programmers money to make PR on Firefox.

      • @aidan
        link
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I did try, unfortunately, in something as big as a browser it’s very time consuming to even fix simple bugs without side effects.