• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    411 months ago

    Oh come on. It’s text. You can stop reading at any time. Not everything has to have trigger warnings, which are generally not effective and can in fact be harmful

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1511 months ago

      I don’t think marking it as NSFW is an unreasonable request. Especially when it actually is NSFW.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Eh, I can see it - like right now I’m posting this from my phone but I’m on my employer’s wifi, some employers might have a problem with what is accessed over their network… Though if that’s the case, pretty much all of Lemmy should probably be considered NSFW…

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                111 months ago

                If that’s the standard we use, even being on lemmy is nsfw. The titles/thumbnails/etc.

    • @TheTetrapod
      link
      911 months ago

      I agree with this take. The point of NSFW is pictures, not text. Who’s reading over your shoulder?

      • StrikerM
        link
        811 months ago

        It’s not that people might read it over your shoulders and be offended. It’s the fact that it’s gross and some might not like being exposed to it. Keep in mind there’s been multiple reports about this post.

    • StrikerM
      link
      611 months ago

      I dunno. Some people may not like to read about vaginas seeping pus and would probably appreciate a heads up that the meme contains that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        311 months ago

        This is a shitposting sub. There’s lots of stuff that lots of people don’t want to read. Doesn’t mean every post needs to have a description of what will be in the post. And marking it as NSFW just devalues the point of NSFW