I notice programming stuff leaks into my thinking and writing often but I actually enjoy the various constructs that help clarify thinking. I don’t have any formal background in logic tho :(
What are some useful and accessible logical tools/operators/symbols that help in thinking+“pseudocode” Edit: definitely useful math/cs/logical symbols are particularly interesting
If you can, please copy/paste the actual unicode symbol or whatever
No there’s something else. Its not quite scientific but its this pop-business study of bottleneck condtions and how to structure processes and organizations to remove bottlenecks/optimize for particular outcomes by resolving strategic bottlenecks.Don’t know why I can’t remember.> Something something neccessary but not sufficientThere’s a famous book, something about an auto plant…i dunno its gone from meThats what I was thinking of
Ah! ToC does synergize very nicely with Lean Six Sigma principles.
It sounds like some study of Systems Engineering, Process Improvement, and Project Management would help you in your goal. Not so much in the way of the kind of dense and precise operative symbology you get out of formal Logic, but in the form of less rigorous but still useful analysis and problem-solving methodologies. Just formally mapping dependencies alone can be a powerful tool.
I just like the idea of certain symbols: conventions as a leverage for more systematic or explicit thinking. I like my coding stuff has helped give me some tools I wouldn’t generally have based on background and I wanna collect them in the same way MentalModels are aggregated/referenced
It’s math instead of coding for me, but same. That’s what pushed me to SE/PI/PM. Formal Symbolic Logic is going to be where you find pretty much all of the explicit symbols you’re looking for. General System Theory also makes frequent use of differential equations, and if you understand DE than it can provide a helpful framework, but Logic is going to be most of what you want.
What about LaTeX or whatever? Would that be of any use to me?
Eh, I haven’t really used it personally but from what I can tell it’s more about formatting than anything else. It would probably be useful if you want to type up any analysis that uses less common symbols, but as far as I know it doesn’t really present symbols which don’t originate elsewhere.