• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No because that would be distribution, as I’ve already stated.

    If it doesn’t spit out raw data and instead changes it somehow, it’s a derivative work.

    I can spell out the distinction for you twice more if you still don’t get it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Exactly! Then you agree that because chatgpt can be coerced into spitting out raw, unmodified data, distributing it is a violation of copyright. Glad we’re on the same page.

      You should look up the term “rhetorical question” by the way.