• @avapa
        link
        1111 months ago

        Seriously. I used Manjaro for a short period about 5 or 6 years ago but ran into so many issues with it. Vanilla Arch on the other hand is very forgiving in my experience. I have a second desktop PC with Arch installed and I only update that machine once every couple of months when I actually need to use it. In my four years of doing that I never had an update break my system.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          911 months ago

          I’ve used and come back to Arch for nearly 8 years now and Manjaro has always been a broken distribution and genuinely gives Arch a bad rep.

          Arch has always been a very stable daily driver for me, never breaking and never having issues with it. I’m always confused on what people are doing when they have issues with their entire distro breaking, especially since you pick all your packages and such anyways.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            311 months ago

            I’ve had a few breaking changes in 10 years of dailying Arch across multiple devices.

            Most egregiously one time a PAM update included a new PAM config… which got applied as .pacnew, but the new PAM config was critical and I could not login with a cryptic error message.

            That probably took me a solid hour to figure out, because config file conflicts is probably pacman’s weakest point. At least apt starts conflict resolution by default.

      • @woelkchen
        link
        411 months ago

        I don’t think in this specific case it does, though. I had similar problems with a completely different distribution. I’m convinced that it’s an upstream Qt or KDE issue where broken caches or changed cache formats don’t get automatically invalidated and rebuild. In the case I vividly remember some lower level graphics library was updated and everything seemed to run fine but for some (and only some) users it resulted in Qt or some KDE component not being able to parse the cache any longer. After some research (under Gnome) I wrote a small script that quit Plasma and KWin, deleted all the caches (icon, font, …) and then launched KWin and Plasma again. Worked fine and came handy on a couple of further occasions.

    • @PrefersAwkward
      link
      English
      17
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Ideally, you should use Pamac (if you’re doing CLI), not Pacman, to update Manjaro. Haven’t used Manjaro in a while, but this is gospel most of the time.

      EDIT: clarity

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        9
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Is it because of the offset between the main packages and the AUR? Man, that’s such a bad decision.

        Edit: they seem to be using yay as the package manager.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          611 months ago

          From the Gentoo user and Debian/RedHat server admin perspective the whole AUR mess with its 20 package managers just for that and its different way to install stuff compared to the main distro packages has always made me stop Arch-based distros whenever I gave them a try. Why can’t they do what Gentoo and Debian and RedHat distros do and have one unified packaging system for all packages?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            611 months ago

            You can use pacman and makepkg for everything if you want. Alternative tools are for convenience.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              111 months ago

              On the other binary distros I don’t have to compile third party packages myself though. And on Gentoo I use ebuilds for everything and they are super-easy to write, especially if you have a similar package as a starting point.

    • Agility0971
      link
      311 months ago

      how is mime cache related to this?