• AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
    link
    English
    41 year ago

    Which means all the salaries go down, and the rich just keep getting richer.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Usually what’s happened in the past is that new jobs become economical. If every possible job is replaced then that’s the new territory.

      I’m highly, highly skeptical this robot doesn’t suck, though. They say it won’t fully replace their workers, and I suspect that’s because it’s going to get stuck around a tricky corner or tangled in a loose pieces of packing tape constantly.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
        link
        English
        111 months ago

        Then instead of a warehouse full of people, Amazon will end up with a warehouse full of robots, and a few robot babysitters.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Best case, yes exactly. But again, that’s happened before many times though (once upon a time, there was no conveyor belts or cranes in a warehouse either, there was guys doing that work) so I’m not too worried. Worst case it just fails.

          • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
            link
            English
            111 months ago

            The difference is that conveyor belts weren’t poised to impact 80% of all jobs on the planet, AI is.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              211 months ago

              Okay, modern agriculture then. Before industrialisation, 98% of people worked in agriculture as basically peasants. Now it’s pretty much exactly the opposite, with 2% working in something related.

              I agree AI could be a major problem if it gets even a little bit better. This specific story isn’t an example though.

    • Possibly linux
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      That sounds like a justification for not practicing financial literacy.