• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Usually what’s happened in the past is that new jobs become economical. If every possible job is replaced then that’s the new territory.

    I’m highly, highly skeptical this robot doesn’t suck, though. They say it won’t fully replace their workers, and I suspect that’s because it’s going to get stuck around a tricky corner or tangled in a loose pieces of packing tape constantly.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      Then instead of a warehouse full of people, Amazon will end up with a warehouse full of robots, and a few robot babysitters.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Best case, yes exactly. But again, that’s happened before many times though (once upon a time, there was no conveyor belts or cranes in a warehouse either, there was guys doing that work) so I’m not too worried. Worst case it just fails.

        • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          The difference is that conveyor belts weren’t poised to impact 80% of all jobs on the planet, AI is.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            Okay, modern agriculture then. Before industrialisation, 98% of people worked in agriculture as basically peasants. Now it’s pretty much exactly the opposite, with 2% working in something related.

            I agree AI could be a major problem if it gets even a little bit better. This specific story isn’t an example though.