The ability to change features, prices, and availability of things you’ve already paid for is a powerful temptation to corporations.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    610 months ago

    I’m legit unsure whether your argument is purposely bad or you just don’t know that it is.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      It’s a thousand times better than this empty garbage. How does this have any upvotes?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Because the issue at hand is more like if you bought tickets to the circus, but when you went to go see it you were told the circus isn’t there anymore and you don’t get a refund.

        That I would definately call stealing, and if I wanted to see the circus the next time it was in town I would absolutely sneak in.

        • @jimbo
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 months ago

            This is where the analogy breaks down, because the circus requires people and an area to operate in. Digital movies and TV shows should just require my device to watch it on.

            To strain the metaphor further: The Circus leaving the venue isn’t leaving town, they’re just moving across the street. But your tickets are only valid for the old venue. Do you expect people to purchase new tickets or just sneak in?

            There’s also the people who purchased a lifetime membership to the circus and then were told the next day “The circus will no longer be going to that venue anymore after the end of the month.”

            The expectation is that I purchased this media and can watch it as much as I want, whenever I want, for the rest of my life. When companies say “Lol, no. Fine print” reasonable people aren’t going to shrug their shoulders and say “You got me, I guess I’ll purchase more things.” They’ll say “screw that, I can get it for free and keep it forever, what service are you providing that’s better?”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -410 months ago

          A more honest analogy for the situation was that there are very few incidents of circuses doing that and now people demand it’s morally justified to get free entrance to every circus, concert, fair, museum, …

          • @friend_of_satan
            link
            English
            510 months ago

            “Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me” though, right?

          • @Linkerbaan
            link
            English
            310 months ago

            It’s not just a few circusses. Every major circus company seems to consistently pull this trick.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -110 months ago

              But people aren’t just sharing media that is affected. They pirate everything, even when there are ways to buy and own it.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                110 months ago

                But people aren’t just sharing media that is affected. They pirate everything, even when there are ways to buy and own it.

                “Some people speed on roads, so all roads are bad.”

                This conversation is about media you can’t buy and own.