Crosspost from [email protected].

An overview of studies which investigate correlations between morality and religious vs. secular / atheist ideologies presented by Phil Zuckerman who is a professor of sociology and secular studies at the Claremont colleges in California, USA.

Summary: Atheists / secular people not only have morals but are even more moral than religious people.

Note: Of course moral is a matter of perspective. In this context we agree that compassion and empathy are our foundations of moral.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    English
    111 months ago

    What are you even talking about now?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -611 months ago

      You literally forgot that you posted a quote claiming that religion is necessary for immoral actions?

      Are you actually so stupid that external parties understand your motivations better than you?

      • Flying Squid
        link
        English
        111 months ago

        Insulting me does not clarify your previous post, but it does make me uninclined to talk with you further. I have very little interest in incivility.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -311 months ago

          There is nothing to clarify, especially since you never even specified what confused you.

          “It does make me uninclined to talk to you further”

          Oh no, what shall I do?

          • Flying Squid
            link
            English
            111 months ago

            Everything you say confuses me, starting with you having some issue with me pasting a quote. Why do you even give a shit? If you don’t like what I post, just block me.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -111 months ago

              “Why do you even give a shit”

              Why did you post it? My reason for posting a criticism is atleast as valid as yours for posting the initial comment. The primary difference is that my clearly satirical fake quote wasn’t deliberately conveying a false statement.

              “Just block me”

              Please people, don’t criticise me!

              If you announce something to the public, the public can respond back. The world isn’t a pulpit to preach from.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -1
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  I characterised my statement as a fake quote, you illiterate dolt, “fake” is literally directly after "my " and before “quote”. It was satirizing your quote-mining of a clearly false statement, by attributing another clearly false statement to a noted logician and pretending that it was therefore correct, because that’s exactly what you did.

                  • Flying Squid
                    link
                    English
                    111 months ago

                    Huh. So maybe I’m not the genius you claimed I think I am and actually the idiot I think I am.

                    Can you imagine? You not being right about me?