@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 year agoaLiEnS!!1mander.xyzimagemessage-square100fedilinkarrow-up1858arrow-down122
arrow-up1836arrow-down1imageaLiEnS!!1mander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square100fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]OPMlinkfedilinkEnglish21•edit-21 year agoPyramids = basic engineering shape for a sturdy structure. Wide base, tapered top. A lot of early monumental structures were constructed with that basic concept in mind.
minus-square@Num10cklinkEnglish10•1 year agoits not the basic shape thats impressive, its the truly gigantic pieces that have tighter tolerances than a tesla.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•edit-21 year agoI don’t think people have ever been blown away from the shape of them. Edit: and it’s actually really silly to think about someone who would be… “Woah! How are those things triangles???” Like what?
Pyramids = basic engineering shape for a sturdy structure. Wide base, tapered top. A lot of early monumental structures were constructed with that basic concept in mind.
its not the basic shape thats impressive, its the truly gigantic pieces that have tighter tolerances than a tesla.
I don’t think people have ever been blown away from the shape of them.
Edit: and it’s actually really silly to think about someone who would be… “Woah! How are those things triangles???” Like what?