• @systemglitch
    link
    English
    -11 year ago

    Says someone who lives exclusively in a city

    • Franklin
      link
      English
      7
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Trains and trans are a more cost effective and environmentally friendly way to transport the masses. It can work to a surprisingly small populations as evidenced by all of the small disparate towns in Switzerland, Norway and Denmark that depend on them.

      Of course no solution works everywhere but cars should never be our first option.

      • @buzz86us
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        The US used to have robust systems of transit, but they’ve largely been demolished

        • Echo Dot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Actually the US has plenty of robust rail connections but they’re almost exclusively used for cargo.

          • @buzz86us
            link
            English
            41 year ago

            I was referring to trolleys…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        People seem to forget that there was a time before cars, where people had to rely on public transport alone.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      Most people live in a city. In Australia and NZ it’s around 90%, in China, Europe and Canada for sure over 50%.

    • @kameecoding
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      I don’t actually, I live in a small town, and I see american style suburbs popping up and it’s fucking disgusting

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Man over 90% of the population is most countries lives in a fucking city.

      Helping them get off cars would be a massive improvement.