• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Being vehemently against racism and fascism is left. It’s the logical extreme opposite of “a certain group of people are superior to everyone else”: “everyone is equal and their basic necessities should be provided for free”

    You just seem to disagree with the folks over on grad and Lemmy devs on how that can be achieved, and maybe to what extent it should be. They believe an authority is necessary to enforce those rules, or you get corporations and billionaires steering the government to wage wars for profit from oil, materials etc. like what’s happening now.

    Personally, I see being pro-China like they are on grad as much less worrying than being pro-US, the latter of which I have a feeling .world mods wouldn’t block because of their inherent western bias. Only one of the two have constantly invaded other countries for their resources, or overthrown democratically elected foreign governments to replace them with military dictatorships.

    • Roflmasterbigpimp
      link
      English
      351 year ago

      Only one of the two have constantly invaded other countries

      The People of Tibet might disagree there. But this is a discussion for another Time.

      I’m not pro US either, tho. I just call out evil when I see it. And that’s my Problem with Lemygrad. They seem to believe there are only two sides. I can say America does bad things and China, Russia etc. does bad things. They pick one side and argue and justify away the crimes “their” Side has done. And that’s not how we come forward. Evil is Evil is Evil. No matter who does it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -8
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They pick one side and argue and justify away the crimes “their” Side has done

        That’s a heavy oversimplification of everything on there… I see the folks on grad being mad about bad decisions by China just the same; they just heavily scrutinize negative news for bias or misinfo, as people should do for everything.

        If you do scrutinize your news and sources, I think it’s only natural that you’d end up being very anti-west/imperialism, and far less anti-China, specially considering the grip western media and news have on the world. The two are just not equivalent at all.

        The People of Tibet might disagree there

        Here’s an example of that. The fact that China’s education system makes sure ~90% of Tibetans can speak their cultural language compared to the ~8% of North Americans that can speak theirs means they’re just not equivalent. The only countries accusing China of such a fucked up crime like cultural repression are western ones with a political/economic interest for doing so. Muslim countries and the global south side with China on this and Xinjiang.

        • Roflmasterbigpimp
          link
          English
          22
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You don’t get it. I don’t compare. It is not that is worse than that. China attacked Tibet and conquered their Land. I don’t need to compare this to the US. I don’t care if Country XYZ says it was good. Evil is Evil is Evil. Pull yourself away from comparing. You don’t have to weigh Evil against each other.

          EDIT:

          They pick one side and argue and justify away the crimes “their” Side has done.

          You are doing exactly that. You try to argue and justify the annexation of Tibet. You could easily say “Yeah, that was not okay. China invaded and occupied Tibet, this is not okay.” But instead you are trying to compare this to the US and bring up other Countries and what they think. THIS is exactly what I meant.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -11
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            you are trying to compare this to the US and bring up other Countries and what they think

            Shouldn’t we look at different sources and scrutinize events and claims thoroughly? You seem to be thinking you’re being objective by taking a centrist position on these but this

            China invaded and occupied Tibet

            is a western claim, and exactly what the US and EU wants its citizens to think by drawing a false equivalence between them and their geopolitical rival. Tibet had a popular revolutionary party whose views were in line with the rest of China that wanted China’s help overthrowing the Dalai Lama, under whom slavery and serfdom was common in the region. There absolutely were factions supporting the prior feudal rule, but chalking that up to “China invaded and occupied Tibet” is absurd and extremely misleading. Tibet is an autonomous region now.

            Hell, the Tibetan uprising against the Chinese government later on was organized by the CIA, and the US is open about it and even proud of it now. Here’s a book on that written by a US district judge and a journal by a professor on Tibetan studies. It’s similar to how the US overthrew the democratically elected Mosaddegh in Iran because his policies would benefit Iran instead of the US.

            • Roflmasterbigpimp
              link
              English
              121 year ago

              Again you feel the need to bring up the US. This is all you got, isn’t it? “Hey, Hey, don’t call out my Camp, look at the US. They are bad!”.

              You honestly believe everyone lies? Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, International Campaign for Tibet, Tibetan Centre for Human Rights and Democracy, the UN. All lie? But China tells the truth. You are so far gone it’s unbelievable. You question well documented facts, but you won’t believe that a regime that is notorious for lying won’t lie? You are waaaay too far gone that I, a random Person from the Internet, could ever convince you. I’m just going to block you, you are not worth arguing with any further. You have nothing of value to say I couldn’t read in a Chinese propaganda pamphlet.

            • @Blue_Morpho
              link
              English
              101 year ago

              Tibet had a popular revolutionary party whose views were in line with the rest of China that wanted China’s help overthrowing the Dalai Lama, under whom slavery and serfdom was common in the region.

              Yes Tibet was a theocratic slave state. But China still invaded and annexed them.

              Was the US invasion of Iraq justified because Saddam was a dictator? If we annexed Iraq and didn’t make them speak English it would be fine?

              • Roflmasterbigpimp
                link
                English
                91 year ago

                Forget it. He is too far gone. We are just Strangers on the Internet, and he lives inside a paranoid nightmare. I tried my best but got nowhere.

                • @Blue_Morpho
                  link
                  English
                  111 year ago

                  I can see his side because Tibet was a Theocratic slave state. But he pretends China didn’t invade.

                • DarkThoughts
                  link
                  fedilink
                  71 year ago

                  He’s clearly a tankie. I wonder if lemmy.zip is just as bad as lemmygrad or lemmy.ml.
                  I know why I went to kbin though. I just have no desire to directly support those developers.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -11 year ago

                  he lives inside a paranoid nightmare

                  Lmao I wouldn’t go that far. But we can’t all see eye-to-eye ig unfortunately.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -9
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                China invaded and annexed them.

                Again, the popular Tibetan revolutionary party fought the feudal rule and welcomed Chinese intervention; their views were in line with the rest of China, and the autonomous nature of the region while being part of China reflects that.

                the US invasion of Iraq

                Not even comparable. There were no popular pro-US movements fighting Saddam’s rule, and Iraq was destabilized in the first place because of US sanctions, not Saddam’s decisions unlike the feudalism in Tibet. This was purely a strategic invasion to set up military bases and secure oil and resources by making up false claims of WMDs.

                • @Blue_Morpho
                  link
                  English
                  131 year ago

                  popular Tibetan revolutionary party

                  If they were popular, they wouldn’t have needed China to invade. China was supporting them just like the US supported revolutionaries that overthrew their governments.

                  There were no popular pro-US movements fighting Saddam’s rule

                  The Kurds.

                  This was purely a strategic invasion to set up military bases and secure oil and resources by making up false claims of WMDs.

                  Their are no us military bases in Iraq and all the oil money goes to Iraq.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -51 year ago

                    If they were popular, they wouldn’t have needed China

                    Why wouldn’t commoners in a feudal slave state not want help from a nearby government whose views match their own?

                    just like the US supported revolutionaries that overthrew their governments

                    The US overthrew democratically elected popular governments, like Mosaddegh’s in Iran, or Salvador Allende’s in Iraq, replacing the latter with a military dictatorship, because their policies benefitted their own countries instead of the US.

                    Their are no us military bases in Iraq and all the oil money goes to Iraq.

                    …What? There are still military bases in Iraq even now, and the economic dependence on the US that Iraq is now in is exactly what the US wanted/wants. ExxonMobil, Chevron etc. extracting oil for cheap from a war-torn country that doesn’t have a choice; even CNN admits it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              4
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              So are you saying that China didn’t abduct a child in an attempt to exterminate Tibetan culture? Surely there is no way to defend such things and this should be a very easy thing to condemn?

        • DessertStorms
          link
          fedilink
          121 year ago

          Amazing, it only took you 2 comments to land right on genocide denial, unprovoked.
          You’re a tankie, defending other tankies, and tankies aren’t communists, nor are you on the left, since you clearly aren’t in support of freedom and equality for all, never mind the rest of it, just more of the same bullshit - authoritarians co opting leftist ideas and language to grab power. Tale as old as fucking time…

    • @kameecoding
      link
      English
      191 year ago

      I would say pro Putin people can’t be called leftists they are nazis in red.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t think they’re pro-Putin? Seem to be as much against Russian imperialism and capitalism as they are against US’s.

        Edit: Lmao one of the first comments I saw on there:

        Putin will be a narcissistic fence sitter who abuses power for his own ends

        So yeah, not very “pro-Putin”

        • @kameecoding
          link
          English
          91 year ago

          and I saw some very pro Putin shit in places like chapotraphouse,even people for the genocide of ukraine

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I do wonder how much of that is Russian psyop. I feel like the whole chapotraphouse thing was started or at least very influenced by bad actors and propaganda bots. That place was a shitshow, for sure.

            • @EndlessApollo
              link
              English
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Probably none of it, but knowing how Russia is that wouldn’t surprise me. That’s just how tankies are, no need for russian intervention. They’re just as bad as Nazis for “that genocide didn’t happen, but if it did they deserved it” type shit

        • @EndlessApollo
          link
          English
          5
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          “I found literally one comment that doesn’t support Putin so clearly the tankie instance doesn’t support him!”

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -41 year ago

            I literally have a hexbear account. People scream that the tankies love putin and that couldn’t be further from the truth. USSR? Yes but they shit on modern day Russia a lot

            • @EndlessApollo
              link
              English
              21 year ago

              I would tell you to go to hell for being on hexbear, but apparently you haven’t been on there enough to see how pro-russia and pro-Putin tankies tend to be

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -71 year ago

                And apparently you haven’t been on there long enough to see how wrong you are. Link me this pro putin propaganda, I’ll wait

                • @EndlessApollo
                  link
                  English
                  6
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Hey look literally your most recent comment is pushing the “meat grinder” narrative that Zelensky is evil for sending innocent people to die in “his” war of aggression xD

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -71 year ago

                    Yeah what’s your point? It’s pretty obvious that’s what’s happening. Fighting a losing battle, making no progress. You gonna tell me that Russias on the brink of collapse next?

                • @EndlessApollo
                  link
                  English
                  3
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  r/genzedong and I think a couple other tankie subreddits literally got taken down for spreading pro-russia disinformation https://time.com/6160519/reddit-international-hate-speech-ban/ . I’ve seen a bunch of shit from them and from hexbear and grad about how Putin is based for denazifying Ukraine and shit, but no number of actual examples of that I could link would change your mind bc putin’s boot just tastes too nice to you, so why would I even bother subjecting myself to cunts like you calling for Ukrainian and Jewish genocide?