• NeuromancerM
      link
      fedilink
      -211 months ago

      You have yet to say which part you think applies nor refuted the cites I have you. You ignore the case law or weren’t even aware if the case law.

      • @Rhoeri
        link
        0
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        HAH!

        Dude you lost this argument the moment it started:

        The Establishment Clause is a limitation placed upon the United States Congress preventing it from passing legislation establishing an official religion, and by interpretation making it illegal for the government to promote theocracy or promote a specific religion with taxes.

        The Free Exercise Clause prohibits the government from preventing the free exercise of religion.

        While the Establishment Clause does prohibit Congress from preferring one religion over another, it does not prohibit the government’s involvement with religion to make accommodations for religious observances and practices in order to achieve the purposes of the Free Exercise Clause.

        Just stop man. You’re embarrassing yourself.

        • NeuromancerM
          link
          fedilink
          -211 months ago

          Who are you replying to as it has nothing to do with what I said?

          • @Rhoeri
            link
            011 months ago

            My god you’re embarrassing! It’s almost adorable!

            • ThrowawayOPM
              link
              fedilink
              -311 months ago

              Please do not name call. It’s part of rule 1. Consider this a warning.

              • @Rhoeri
                link
                2
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                For the record, where was their warning when they said the other person “looked silly?” or are we showing a bias?

                EDIT: Yeah. I thought as much.

              • @Rhoeri
                link
                111 months ago

                I see why the other person blocked you. You’re clearly a troll.