• NeuromancerM
    link
    fedilink
    -21 year ago

    You have yet to say which part you think applies nor refuted the cites I have you. You ignore the case law or weren’t even aware if the case law.

    • @Rhoeri
      link
      0
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      HAH!

      Dude you lost this argument the moment it started:

      The Establishment Clause is a limitation placed upon the United States Congress preventing it from passing legislation establishing an official religion, and by interpretation making it illegal for the government to promote theocracy or promote a specific religion with taxes.

      The Free Exercise Clause prohibits the government from preventing the free exercise of religion.

      While the Establishment Clause does prohibit Congress from preferring one religion over another, it does not prohibit the government’s involvement with religion to make accommodations for religious observances and practices in order to achieve the purposes of the Free Exercise Clause.

      Just stop man. You’re embarrassing yourself.

      • NeuromancerM
        link
        fedilink
        -21 year ago

        Who are you replying to as it has nothing to do with what I said?

        • @Rhoeri
          link
          01 year ago

          My god you’re embarrassing! It’s almost adorable!

            • @Rhoeri
              link
              11 year ago

              I see why the other person blocked you. You’re clearly a troll.

          • ThrowawayOPM
            link
            fedilink
            -31 year ago

            Please do not name call. It’s part of rule 1. Consider this a warning.

            • @Rhoeri
              link
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              For the record, where was their warning when they said the other person “looked silly?” or are we showing a bias?

              EDIT: Yeah. I thought as much.