• Shake747
    link
    fedilink
    91 year ago

    That’s a fair criticism, we do need to find a better way

    • @AllonzeeLV
      link
      31
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The Nords found it because they keep their capitalism restrained as it should be to serve the interests of the people in their societies instead of the reverse as it has become here.

      The problem, of course, is the market crony hyper-capitalists that spawned mostly out of the US are using their power/capital to do what they did here everywhere else in it’s insatiable quest for growth/metastasis. The UK has already fallen to the faustian bargain of “YOU can live large, just sell out your fellow citizens.” Germany is getting on board, France’s people are fighting but losing. Unrestrained capitalism high on its own greed is absolutely cancerous and deadly.

      Capitalism CAN when tightly, tightly straight jacketed, be used to incentivize labor as communism cannot, but it must be tempered by the heaviest of taxation for the commons. Being a doctor or a lawyer should yield better rewards than a janitor, but within fucking reason/sanity.

      Should a Doctor be able to afford a bigger house and a nicer car than an average worker for their effort? Sure. Should they be able to afford 3 houses to the janitor’s studio apartment in a bad neighborhood? No, both provide essential services to society after all.

      There needs to be a drain for out of control capital acquisition or that capital will eventually be used to propagate greed and capture the regulatory bodies meant to keep the sociopath that is capitalism sedated and restrained. No individual should possess enough capital to have more power over socetal structures than their single vote allows.

      In exchange for not allowing greed to run absolutely rampant as it does here, they go to college based on merit, get healthcare when they need it, don’t end up homeless in hard times, don’t sweat job security, on and on…

      https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/rankings/happiness/

      At least until the global markets find enough greed driven traitors in those societies to “turn the bull loose” there too. Because once they get a foothold, that’s the ball game until collapse. Once that happens, they start using their for profit media machines to propagandize division within the citizenry, ensuring no meaningful counter movement, they use their power over government to indoctrinate children through education to call greed “rational self-interest,” deify profiteers as “job creators,” to feel hatred rather than empathy towards those that are struggling(herp derp those evil powerless homeless people are lowering my property values! If they can’t/won’t work, why won’t they just die?), etc. That’s why the US will need to collapse under the weight of its own corruption before things can even begin to improve. We’re too far captured.

      • MacN'Cheezus
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        The Nords also revere a man-god named Talos whose worship has been outlawed by the Aldmeri Dominion. Coincidence? I think not.

      • @Supervisor194
        link
        -21 year ago

        Amazingly well put. Capitalism is necessary. Unrestrained capitalism is deadly. The unfortunate reality of capitalism is that even as it is in the process of burning everything to the ground, it looks for all the world like glorious success. And it is glorious success, if you don’t compare it to what could be in a system where it was properly restrained.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          14
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Capitalism is in no way necessary. It’s a poison, a cancer, a virus which at all given times threatens to destroy the fabric of society, all for the next quarter’s profit.

        • Instigate
          link
          fedilink
          111 year ago

          Capitalism isn’t necessary; a new economic system that takes some aspects of capitalism is necessary. If you have to strip capitalism of all of its core features to make it work, you’re no longer dealing with capitalism but rather a different economic model.

          • @MotoAsh
            link
            15
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I agree. People who say, “nuhuh, capitalism works!” are 99% of the time thinking of the basic concept of markets or money. Which … Very specifically, are NOT capitalism.

            They are used (and abused) by capitalists, but they are not inventions of capitalists.

            • @Gradually_Adjusting
              link
              English
              41 year ago

              Reason 1 that I’m happy to ditch reddit for Lemmy completely is watching these ideas explained by other people, every day.

              Not having to explain the difference between capitalism and commerce feels 😩🔥

            • @SuckMyWang
              link
              11 year ago

              So what’s the difference between capitalism and markets? I would have thought the freer the market the more capitalistic it was, not so much that there’s a separation of the two.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                Ownership of Capital. Capitalism has markets, but not all market systems are Capitalist.

                Market Socialism, for example, has competing worker-owned entities like Co-operatives in a market system, with no Capitalists.

                Capitalism is a relatively new phenomena in the grand scheme of things.

                • @SuckMyWang
                  link
                  21 year ago

                  Can a cooperative compete in a capitalist market? As in shouldn’t the better system win out in a free market?

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    11 year ago
                    1. Kind of. The market can have Capitalist entities and Socialist entities, but the market itself isn’t Capitalist.

                    2. Not necessarily. Co-operatives are more difficult to start in a predominantly Capitalist system, and Capitalist entities usually can exploit their workers more in order to gain temporary competitive advantage. I don’t believe this is sufficient reasoning to value Capitalism over Socialist entities.

                    I’m not a Market Socialist, for clarification, as I do think there are issues. However, Capitalism isn’t markets.

        • @AllonzeeLV
          link
          -5
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Thank you!

          In their pure forms, I see capitalism and communism as extremes specifically with regards to human nature.

          Communism starves our human impulses to succeed and grow, but capitalism gluts and force feeds our worst impulses exclusively, selfishness, unhealthy competition, jealousy, schadenfreude, sociopathy, self-delusion, narcissism, dehumanization, on and on, which is why I see it as the greater evil of the 2 in a vacuum.

          A successful communist society would be very difficult to grow, but maybe that would be a good thing on a planet of finite resources that can take finite finite pollution. That’s why the answer lies somewhere in democratic socialism, imho.

          That’s all academic though. The rigged market hyper-capitalists own this fucking place and have an iron grip on it. Plus communism would have kept the population low, as it should have been. It wouldn’t be able to accommodate the needs of our ridiculously massive human population as it is. That ship has sailed unless we want billions to starve to right it and live within sustainable means in this finite habitat.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            71 year ago

            Communism starves our human impulses to succeed and grow

            Nothing about communism forces human impulses to be ignored, unless you mean the impulses we already suppress as sentient beings, such as fucking everything that moves or eating until we literally die.

            • @AllonzeeLV
              link
              -2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              We are socially competitive animals, just as you can observe in other evolutionarily programmed creatures. We compare ourselves to others, we want to impress mates, etc.

              Equality of economic outcome regardless of effort goes against that, which is probably necessary on a planet of finite resources and the scale of our waste, but it does go against that large aspect of our nature.

              For the record, I’m probably closer to you ideologically than you think. I think unfettered capitalism does more damage to humanity and the planet than communism ever could, but if you think communism lacks any drawbacks and is perfect, you are mistaken.

              There is no such thing as perfection, especially any construct made by mankind. That’s coming from someone who is all for going Old School French on Wall Street and socializing entire economic sectors for the good of the citizenry.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                31 year ago

                We are socially competitive animals, just as you can observe in other evolutionarily programmed creatures. We compare ourselves to others, we want to impress mates, etc.

                All of which can be achieved in a communist system, only instead of “look at my huge paycheck”, it’d be “look at all these skills I’ve acquired thanks to free public education and more free time”. People would stop mindlessly showing off innane manufactured waste and start actually acquire useful knowledge.

                • @SupraMario
                  link
                  -41 year ago

                  Man you’re naive…you really think people are going to go around busting their asses to study, only to be rewarded with I have skills that allow me to do even harder mental tasks for the same physical rewards as someone who gets the same free time and paycheck and house and car as I do…

                  • @MotoAsh
                    link
                    11 year ago

                    Your inability to imagine only reveals how pathetically greedy and underdeveloped you are.

                    I hope one day you develop an actual skill so you too can know the joys of not being a waste of oxygen.

                  • @LemmysMum
                    link
                    0
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    I go around busting enjoying the opportunity to study because it provides me the capacity to be more intelligent, more cognizant, and more capable than my dirt pounding contemporaries, in more ways than just the value of the knowledge provides.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -11 year ago

                    I’m not naïve, it’s just that you are a bad person whose moral code can’t fathom working not for oneself, but for the betterment of the collective.

                    I already do just that, by the way - study for the sake of knowledge, not for increasing my capital.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            61 year ago

            Sorry, but you’re highly wrong about your misconceptions of Communism. Communism in no way starves human impulses to succeed or grow any more than Capitalist success does. Communism eliminates the profit motive, yes, but that is historically a highly flawed motive in general.

            Socialism/Communism/Anarchism are not fairy-tale Utopias where everyone magically gets a pony, people still work to produce goods and services. However, this production is democratized, in opposition to anti-democratic privatized systems.