Hey all! I’m still in the somewhat early stages of setting up my home server. I have Nextcloud installed for file storage/management. However, realizing that it would be nice to have access to the entire storage drive for the server, I installed File Browser.

Now I’m having a hard time justifying having both. I have a handful of services that could be run as individual services (calDav, notes, news, etc… although, phonetrack seems to be hard to replace).

I’ve noticed lists that people have posted of the “must-have” services on their home servers have included both. My question is “why?” It seems like, at a basic level, they serve similar roles. If you remove the app-platform role from Nextcloud by separately hosting the individual apps, what benefit do you get from having both Nextcloud and File Browser?

I really like NextCloud, but i’m having a hard time justifying the resource usage if its functionality can be replaced by a handful of containers. Or, is that the reason to have it, so you don’t have to do that?

Any opinions on the subject would be appreciated.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    If you have multiple users and want things such as quota management, groups, mounting external storage providers, or perhaps some advanced features such as sso (either as a client or server), then keeping nextcloud would make sense.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Not planning on having more than 2 users so the enterprise-y type features don’t really apply. Very good points though!