• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    271 year ago

    Sounds good, is there any reason why their assets should not be used to compensate for the damages they are causing?

    • @Brainsploosh
      link
      English
      121 year ago

      I’m guessing because a lot of them aren’t clearly marked “Russian state war chest part 12”, but rather things like “Gazprom reserve fund” or “Oligarchs discretionary fund” which would muddy the border between state and private assets.

      State assets might be fine to seize to cover state costs, but the legality of seizing the others’ might by grayer.

    • @AngryCommieKender
      link
      English
      81 year ago

      I’d think that’s why they haven’t been tapped this far. They’re holding out to see if they can hand the Ukrainians something when this shit show is over.

      • @cheese_greater
        link
        English
        -11
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Which is super fucked they’re waiting. Probably waited for Hitler to win to congratulate him on doing the dirty work for 'em, t✡️✡️ and c✡️mpen$ate him für sein/der Kampf or waseva

        • mrnotoriousman
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          Probably because sending equipment and stuff is currently more valuable than just straight cash

          • @cheese_greater
            link
            English
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Why wouldn’t they straight up liquidate and convert it all to weapons like even more directly and promptly and publicly than what you’re saying? Or have i just equivocated that which youmre saying (I’m a little uncertain I’m inferring what you’re intending)

            Edit: like, why wait? Screw the neutrality shit or whatever

    • @cheese_greater
      link
      English
      7
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      To what extent would that a be a larger question for like Switzerland and other Russian/dirty-money-heavy shelter jurisdictions?

    • @chitak166
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      is there any reason why their assets should not be used to compensate for the damages they are causing?

      Losers who would also be responsible for the failure that was Reconstruction.