GrappleHat to [email protected]English • 1 year agoGoogle loses antitrust case vs Epic Games. Jury rules Google Play store constitutes an illegal monopolywww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up1170arrow-down13 cross-posted to: technology[email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]android[email protected]technology[email protected]
arrow-up1167arrow-down1external-linkGoogle loses antitrust case vs Epic Games. Jury rules Google Play store constitutes an illegal monopolywww.theverge.comGrappleHat to [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square33fedilink cross-posted to: technology[email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]android[email protected]technology[email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink30•1 year agoThe Apple case was decided by a judge and this by a jury, which makes a big difference
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink10•1 year agoHow exactly does a jury trial work in a case like this? Aren’t juries supposed to be “peers” of the accused? How can a corporation be tried by a jury of its peers?
The Apple case was decided by a judge and this by a jury, which makes a big difference
How exactly does a jury trial work in a case like this? Aren’t juries supposed to be “peers” of the accused? How can a corporation be tried by a jury of its peers?
In the US, corporations are people
Yeah but who are their peers?
deleted