There’s no way you’d care. I’ve seen what happens when people try to convince you of anything, so why would I waste my time?
You do realize the same person that created Breitbart also created HuffPost.
And how is that relevant? HuffPo is garbage, but they have different editors, writers and staff. Did they ever have a “Black Crime” tag for their stories?
Like I said: you don’t care that they’re a White Nationalist site, because you’d look into it if you did. But you won’t because you don’t.
Just thought I’d let you know why people think y’all are a bunch of fascists.
Because then it seems like you got your “citation” above from reading just the headline of a Breitbart article when you were arguing with Pizzaman about the burden of proof.
The burden of proof is on him. HE can sealion all he wants but it is up to him to disprove the claim. I kindly provided other cites as I didn’t post the Breitbart and once again he asked for more cites. That is a sealion.
As suspected, you can’t back your claim; you will babble about it.
I mainly read CNN.
You do realize the same person that created Breitbart also created HuffPost.
There’s no way you’d care. I’ve seen what happens when people try to convince you of anything, so why would I waste my time?
And how is that relevant? HuffPo is garbage, but they have different editors, writers and staff. Did they ever have a “Black Crime” tag for their stories?
Like I said: you don’t care that they’re a White Nationalist site, because you’d look into it if you did. But you won’t because you don’t.
Just thought I’d let you know why people think y’all are a bunch of fascists.
I look at facts, not emotional, illogical skreeing. So if you have a cite, let’s see it. I don’t have a dog in the fight since I don’t read Breitbart.
I don’t know what you mean by a black crime tag.
Oh Jesus that’s funny!
And I guess you never will, because typing is hard.
I googled it. I found one hit. It doesn’t appear has big issue like you claim.
Yeah, totally not a big deal.
Now if they had a “white crime” tag, that’d be cause for concern.
Weird that I was right when I said you wouldn’t care, huh?
I am not sure what I’m supposed to care about. I don’t read breitbart and you didn’t cite anything.
Because then it seems like you got your “citation” above from reading just the headline of a Breitbart article when you were arguing with Pizzaman about the burden of proof.
The burden of proof is on him. HE can sealion all he wants but it is up to him to disprove the claim. I kindly provided other cites as I didn’t post the Breitbart and once again he asked for more cites. That is a sealion.