• Otter
      link
      fedilink
      English
      39
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      The money would have come from the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund program (RDOF), but the FCC writes that Starlink wasn’t able to “demonstrate that it could deliver the promised service” and that giving the subsidy to it wouldn’t be “the best use of limited Universal Service Fund dollars.”

      The FCC decision sounds like a good thing in this case, also because Starlink isn’t being managed responsibly

      The technology itself is cool, and I hope some other companies can build off that work to meet that need. There are a lot of existing companies that take advantage of those living in rural areas, many of which don’t have other options or much disposable income

    • @SCB
      link
      English
      116 months ago

      Starlink is currently the only internet functioning for the Ukrainian army.

    • @SupraMario
      link
      English
      -36 months ago

      ITAR…go look it up. And the UA still uses it for good and so does everyone there, they just cannot use it as a direct weapon. Get off the musk hate dick… it’s clouding you and apparently a bunch of people’s judgement.

      • Buelldozer
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 months ago

        Like most people on the Internet they don’t want to hear about laws that cause outcomes different than what they want. The Musk hate over UA and StarLink is just another example of it. ITAR has been around a long time and for DAMN good reasons.

        • @SupraMario
          link
          English
          06 months ago

          I can’t stand the guy either, but there are way more valid reasons to hate on him than what people love to bitch about.