I feel you’re under the impression that I share the GP point of view. I don’t. I live in a place where ride sharing apps are regulated and I’m thankful for it. Gig economy jobs can fuck right off.
That being said, it’s not cost that killed taxis and made Uber/Lyft appealing. It’s convenience. If the taxis had joined the modern era instead of being stuck in the 90s (including but not exclusively having a “broken” credit card machine and other dubious tactics), they’d probably have had a way better time. They were caught with their pants down and their head up their asses.
Oh yeah I know, rn the only thing keeping taxis alive is probably the fact that they have dedicated parking spots in some places, usually close to train stations and airports where they easily get business.
“Ride sharing” has also been regulated and now you do need to have the car identified (a crappy sticker on the windshields) and take a course (still cheaper and shorter than actual taxis)
I don’t understand comments like this. Where do you think those “savings” come from? Do you think the suits are like “yeah we’re going to shut down our competition by reducing our own pay/cut of the revenue”? Or do you think they’re going to fuck over the workers?
It’s also more expensive where I live ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
EDIT: Sorry, my bad. I meant that Uber and Lyft are more expensive than normal cabs in my area.
Yes, because the drivers aren’t being exploited like the Uber and Lyft drivers are. They offer cheaper fares because they’re paid an unfair wage.
The trick is them unionising too.
Then it’s gonna be the same price.
There’s a cost to everything. Taxis were already reasonably efficient. Enjoy your VC funded discount rides while you can
I feel you’re under the impression that I share the GP point of view. I don’t. I live in a place where ride sharing apps are regulated and I’m thankful for it. Gig economy jobs can fuck right off.
That being said, it’s not cost that killed taxis and made Uber/Lyft appealing. It’s convenience. If the taxis had joined the modern era instead of being stuck in the 90s (including but not exclusively having a “broken” credit card machine and other dubious tactics), they’d probably have had a way better time. They were caught with their pants down and their head up their asses.
Oh yeah I know, rn the only thing keeping taxis alive is probably the fact that they have dedicated parking spots in some places, usually close to train stations and airports where they easily get business.
“Ride sharing” has also been regulated and now you do need to have the car identified (a crappy sticker on the windshields) and take a course (still cheaper and shorter than actual taxis)
Sorry, my bad. I meant that Uber and Lyft are more expensive than normal cabs in my area.
I don’t understand comments like this. Where do you think those “savings” come from? Do you think the suits are like “yeah we’re going to shut down our competition by reducing our own pay/cut of the revenue”? Or do you think they’re going to fuck over the workers?
Sorry, my comment was unclear. I do agree, I meant Ubers being more expensive for whatever reason…
Doing things right costs money. “Ride share” companies are only cheaper because they screw over their drivers.
And that’s what those illegal cab companies bank on people thinking.
Is it a bit more expensive? Yes. Is it waaaaaaay less exploitative than Uber and Lyft? Fuuuuuuuuck yes.
See my edit :)