Google delayed long enough to secure its ad business with new tracking methods.
  • @RandomPancakeEnglish
    30•1 year ago

    Browser fingerprinting is nasty and easy. There are ways to push back but it’s still awful.

    • @norouteEnglish
      33•1 year ago

      deleted by creator

        • @norouteEnglish
          2•1 year ago

          deleted by creator

      • @RandomPancakeEnglish
        10•1 year ago

        I know people are passionate about their love / hated of Brave, but it along with LibreWolf (and Firefox) all offer strong fingerprinting protection out of the box. With Firefox, just make sure you add uBlock Origin.

      • @jayboneEnglish
        -1•1 year ago

        Wait Firefox sends fingerprint info?

        Why is there not an open source browser that doesn’t send this shit?

        • @[email protected]English
          9•1 year ago

          Firefox does not “send” it, fingerprinting is done by tagging your hardware configuration from various values and create a unique key from that - independent of being logged in or any cookies - which can be used to track you. Things like browser & device user agent, browser window size, feature support (to determine browser version), etc. All of which are passively gathered by anything you could send a request to. There are ways to reduce this that Firefox and others do (such as reducing unique values in user agent, etc) but they’re not opting in to some privacy invading reporting mechanism.

          • @jayboneEnglish
            1•1 year ago

            But the “various values” are sent, like you mention user agent, etc. I wonder if it makes sense to have a browser that doesn’t send all of that.