@[email protected] to SelfhostedEnglish • 10 months agoPlease recommend your cheaper, reliable SSDs 2TB+ (4TB ideal)message-square49fedilinkarrow-up158arrow-down15file-text
arrow-up153arrow-down1message-squarePlease recommend your cheaper, reliable SSDs 2TB+ (4TB ideal)@[email protected] to SelfhostedEnglish • 10 months agomessage-square49fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareFarraigePlaisteachlinkfedilink8•10 months agoI thought that SSD fails “better” than HDD because SDD become read-only first.
minus-square@Postcard64linkEnglish12•edit-210 months agoOnly when they get to the end of life of the cells. If there’s another failure before that, it’s likely a full failure.
minus-squareFarraigePlaisteachlinkfedilink2•10 months agoThanks. In that case is it known which of those two possibilities are most likely?
minus-squarecircuitfarmerlinkfedilinkEnglish2•10 months agoTo my knowledge, that isn’t a consistent pattern (someone please correct if wrong).
minus-squareFarraigePlaisteachlinkfedilink1•10 months agoAccording to @postcard64 below I’m oversimplifying things (at minimum).
I thought that SSD fails “better” than HDD because SDD become read-only first.
Only when they get to the end of life of the cells. If there’s another failure before that, it’s likely a full failure.
Thanks. In that case is it known which of those two possibilities are most likely?
To my knowledge, that isn’t a consistent pattern (someone please correct if wrong).
According to @postcard64 below I’m oversimplifying things (at minimum).