• @doczombie
    link
    English
    411 months ago

    Don’t you? Instant wake is hella useful, especially if you are using a laptop as a laptop and moving between meeting rooms etc, constantly bumping between sleep and wake.

    • @fuckwit_mcbumcrumbleOP
      link
      English
      711 months ago

      S1 sleep was as fast to resume as S0 standby.

      Instead I get 30+ seconds to wake from sleep, 1% battery drain per minute, and the random chance that it just overheats in my bag and crashes. At least on my Surface Pro and Intel U series laptops it’s tolerable, but I’d much rather S1 standby for 30 minutes, S3 standby for 4 hours, before finally hibernating. Instead I currently get buggy S0 for 15 minutes, and hopefully it makes it to complete hibernation after that.

      • @doczombie
        link
        English
        211 months ago

        Yeah windows standby sucks. On platforms where the equivalent of s0 doesn’t suck, it’s awesome.

        • @QuarterSwede
          link
          English
          4
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Bingo. MacBook’s are always ready to wake with little battery loss. Windows just … can’t do that ever. If phones can be expected to behave this way, computers have zero excuses they can’t.

      • bruhduh
        link
        English
        211 months ago

        Oof, felt that, my thinkpad overheated in my backpack while i was dualbooting, it was that hot so my backpack almost combusted

      • @Kethal
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Man, this is why my work laptop does that. It is an all around POS so I chalked this problem up to that. I didn’t know that MS deliberately broke sleep. With this knowledge I’ve learned how to go back to regular sleep.