Meta just announced that they are trying to integrate Threads with ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, etc.). We need to defederate them if we want to avoid them pushing their crap into fediverse.

If you’re a server admin, please defederate Meta’s domain “threads.net

If you don’t run your own server, please ask your server admin to defederate “threads.net”.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    16
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Then you’re evil. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    Go ahead, be evil. It is certainly your prerogative.

    Edit: just look at how many votes “But what if some of us don’t care if they’re evil?” got. Like, what a wild-ass bullshit thing to say. This thread is definitely being astroturfed.

    • TacoButtPlug
      link
      fedilink
      English
      161 year ago

      I’ve noticed a lot of turfing on all of these threadsfed posts. It’s becoming more and more. People just need to get a threads account if it’s so important to them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        Well they’re clearly aware of us, we can’t pretend we’re just a bunch of silly little beans doing our own thing anymore. Of course they’re going to do this. There is literally not a single reason for them not to.

        • TacoButtPlug
          link
          fedilink
          English
          101 year ago

          It just sucks how rapidly it’s becoming. Can’t even spend a year in bliss before the shitheels arrive.

          • sour
            link
            fedilink
            6
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            if you no come to facebook, facebook come to you

            • TacoButtPlug
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              Sad but true. I think the only way anything could ever be restored to the bygone tangible days of the Internet would be to destroy Meta, fully.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            Yeah, but the reason we need federation in the first place is because of the relentless onslaught of monopoly.

            I think this is a good prpblem to have. The fediverse gets to test itself against the largest established social media network, and honestly I don’t see a way for them to win. You can ses it in these replies - they are scared of this boycott. Even more exciting now that I think of if - this isn’t a consumer boycott like we’re used to. This is a boycott by the producers. The instances create the network, so their voices are much more important.

            • 2deck
              link
              English
              71 year ago

              It is exciting. I’ve been impressed by the response to this. Reading between the astroturfing, there’s a community with a sense of purpose here.

              Thanks to all who are here genuinely!

            • TacoButtPlug
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              I’m old enough to know better than be excited. I haven’t seen a single good community have staying power in the time of the entire internet. And it’s only getting worse. Especially when a billion dollar tumor takes interest in where you’re at.

              What I do find interesting and alarming is how aggressive Meta is in seeking out the small inconsequential pockets of the Internet and crushing them. They’re so deadset on fuxing any collective not being monitored by their government backed all seeing eye. It will be interesting to see how a federated social network holds up but I wouldn’t assume they don’t already have at least five game plans to crush it.

    • Draconic NEO
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      We should have rules against turfing like this in the community, and remove or ban people suspected of it. I get the benefits of having a neutral place but at the same time we don’t allow advertising here so why should suspected astroturfing be any different.

    • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -21 year ago

      It’s sarcasm. I upvoted them because I would have said something similar to highlight the absurdity of any argument against defederating with Threads.

    • BaroqueInMind
      link
      fedilink
      -7
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Thanks, it is my prerogative.

      This is the point of the freedom of federated communities: we can read whatever the fuck we want from wherever the fuck we want without having authoritarian censor-heavy limp-wrist adult-baby moderators and corporate fascists determining what we are allowed to read or affiliate with.

      The freedom to read both sides and control what I want to interact with on my own will, and make my own decisions is why I’m fucking here. I don’t want people like you making decisions for me, go fuck yourself.

      Thanks for noticing I’m evil. I’ll go make a nice blood sacrifice to my effigy of Satan by eating another baby.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        141 year ago

        Right, so nobody’s stopping you from joining threads, or making your own instance. You can call it evil.villain. Why don’t you?

      • Dieinahole
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        So when they steamroll this place so hard you only get their side of the story, what then?

        • BaroqueInMind
          link
          fedilink
          -5
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I promise you nothing is going to get steamrolled, you are simply being very ignorant.

          In fact, I will @ you with a reminder in 30 days as a reply to this message of how mundane and routine everything is to prove you are wrong.