Suspects can refuse to provide phone passcodes to police, court rules::Phone-unlocking case law is “total mess,” may be ripe for Supreme Court review.

  • @jordanlund
    link
    English
    1911 months ago

    FTA:

    “The Valdez case does not involve an order to compel a suspect to unlock a device. Instead, “law enforcement asked Valdez to verbally provide his passcode,” Utah justices wrote. “While these circumstances involve modern technology in a scenario that the Supreme Court has not yet addressed, we conclude that these facts present a more straightforward question that is answered by settled Fifth Amendment principles.””

    So now, every cop everywhere is going to be like “Yeah, I’m going to need you to unlock your phone.”

      • @APassenger
        link
        English
        911 months ago

        I’m not discussing my day.

    • KeriKitty (They(/It))
      link
      fedilink
      English
      311 months ago

      That’s a free trade agreement?

      Oh no, I get it, the Federal Transit Administration said that. To the Forum on Tax Administration.

      [Sarcasm] That everything has to be an initialism now is sooooooper convenient and cool. Imean, TEHTBAINISCAC. EWKWTM.