Meta just announced that they are trying to integrate Threads with ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, etc.). We need to defederate them if we want to avoid them pushing their crap into fediverse.

If you’re a server admin, please defederate Meta’s domain “threads.net

If you don’t run your own server, please ask your server admin to defederate “threads.net”.

  • Dieinahole
    link
    fedilink
    4111 months ago

    Everywhere this pops up, the users have decided:

    Fuck meta. Fuck threads. Fuck the zuck.

    Do not associate. Defederate now

    • kpw
      link
      fedilink
      -1011 months ago

      Just block their domain, no need to take away the freedom of other users even if you hate Meta.

        • Carighan Maconar
          link
          English
          -111 months ago

          That’s not how federation works, which makes me worried that users who get to “vote” on this thing (they don’t, it’s the instance owners that do) actually do not understand what would happen.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1011 months ago

            It’s exactly what would happen, as users on my server would look up instances on meta servers.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 months ago

            is there a writeup somewhere that ideally goes into enough detail to clearly understand how instances/federation work and what would really happen ? I hate Meta but I realize I have no clue what threads coming means and implies, decentralized systems are very unintuitive when you’re used to conventional social media.

            • @ttmrichter
              link
              111 months ago

              The simple thing that requires no deep dive into protocol design is that threads brings with it a metric fuckton of users: multiple orders of magnitude more users than the entirety of the fediverse across all platforms and sites put together. People have used the analogy of a cruise ship full of tourists unloading on a small seaside village of a few hundred people and trashing the place even without there being a need for malevolence, and there’s a certain aptness to that.

              Except that Meta is, on top of that, unequivocally malevolent. So to stretch the analogy further, the reason the tourists are unloading in the small village is that Meta Cruise Lines wants to force coastal villages to join their corporate “family” or get obliterated.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                111 months ago

                right, this is quite evocative and what I initially had in mind, but the question seems to be more subtle? A village is a single centralized unit, here instances can defederate and users can block traffic. Will threads users invade the fediverse village or just not care about it, even if they have access? Could it give an opportunity for ppl to read content that will ever only be threads (political figures. institutions, etc.) without having a meta account and using a meta app? Will the bots that apparently plague threads rn will plague the fediverse? Why don’t they now? If some instances defederate and others not, could I have one account where I talk to the tourists, and another account in a defederated instance where I’m back in my calm village?

                I agree with the imagery and moral aspects, but I feel like understanding the practical implications which are not obvious to me is important to gather momentum to kick them out - I felt like people disagree on subjects that they probably shouldn’t if they both had the same understanding of the situation (which includes me).

        • xigoi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -211 months ago

          If I understand correctly, your server will only receive posts from users that someone on your server has subscribed to, so the number is overblown by several orders of magnitude.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                111 months ago

                Because it would drown out all the Lemmy stuff (sorry late replay, Christmas and stuff).

            • Nelfaneor
              link
              fedilink
              111 months ago

              @Valmond
              According to what I’ve read, they haven’t implemented yet but you’ll have to opt in in the settings of a threads account to be seen on the Fediverse. In other words, it won’t be possible to interact unintentionnally with the Fediverse. So, Fediversians will be in a state of complaining in case of bad behaviours coming from Threads.
              https://kbin.social/u/@[email protected]
              @xigoi @fediverse

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                111 months ago

                Interesting. But lemmy is not built to be a personal instance, more of a group thingy (I understand the complexity of it, and I like it, but there are things that will be hard to deal with computer-science complexity wise if one instance gets too big. That’s why I’m not just on board against meta/threads.net, but totally against it). In a nutshell Lemmy will thrive being lots and lots and lots of small servers with sub 100k users (probably 10k is a nice number? Or 35 because you like that rare thing).