• @dai
    link
    English
    -61 year ago

    Protonmail isn’t great, their deliberately misleading about the encryption. Many consider protonmail to be a honeypot.

      • @dai
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        https://www.wired.com/story/protonmail-amends-policy-after-giving-up-activists-data/

        https://cldc.org/does-protonmail-snitch/

        In addition protonmail do not protect your metadata (from memory), it’s not encrypted in transit.

        Protonmail also keep your public and private keys on their servers, it’s PGP however they don’t want the end users to have to manage their own keys. That to me isn’t ideal.

        Receiving from another provider you’ll get TLS encryption until it hits protonmail servers but protonmail will then decrypt your email and again encrypt your email using your PGP stored on their servers.

        Sending an email from proton to another provider will be encrypted on protonmail servers but that’s where it ends. TLS will take care of the in-transit and again may not be stored securely on the receiving end.

      • @YoorWeb
        link
        English
        01 year ago

        He wrote their instead of they’re, make your judgement.

    • @Geek_King
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      Well god damn it! Did you have any links to articles about it? Also what would you view to be better then proton.me?

      • @dai
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        Tuta (in my eyes) is a step in the right direction, using a client like thunderbird or enigmail and managing PGP yourself would be more secure as the message is decrypted by the recipient and not a company owned server.

        • @Geek_King
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          I appreciate the follow up! I’m looking into Tuta to learn more about it! It just sucks Tuta didn’t come up at all when I was researching solid alternatives to Gmail.