• @4realzOP
    link
    English
    -2121 year ago

    Exactly, but “technically” he is credited as a founder. He’s a really good business man.

    • @echo64
      link
      English
      1621 year ago

      He isn’t a “really good business man”, everything he’s made is built on a foundation of lies. Eventually, it’ll collapse or be saved by socialised systems for being too big to fail. Musk is a con man, not a businessman. He’s just made a living out of conning investors and the public alike.

      • TheEntity
        link
        fedilink
        31
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t know, it sounds like the definition of a business man. Not one I’d admire, but not unlike lots of other business men.

        • @echo64
          link
          English
          291 year ago

          No, businessmen do business. Steve Jobs did business, he figured out markets, created markets based on what his business could provide. That’s actual business.

          A grifter, a con man, is not a business man, they wear the skin of one to fool people like yourself into buying into the con. Looks like it works.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            91 year ago

            Steve Jobs also conspired with his competitors to underpay their staff. Staff as in the people that helped him do business and make billions

            • @echo64
              link
              English
              21 year ago

              Yeah, thats being an evil, good businessman. Worked in favour of the business. Tech workers need to unionize to protect from the business people.

          • Tar_Alcaran
            link
            fedilink
            English
            81 year ago

            created markets based on what his business could provide.

            As much as I loathe musk, this is exactly what Starlink is. It’s a company founded solely to buy the product SpaceX is making, because other people couldn’t buy enough.

            Of course, Starlink is floating almost entirely on venture capital, but that’s how Amazon got started too.

            • @echo64
              link
              English
              31 year ago

              Here’s the rub. Starlink is not and can not be profitable without venture capital and subsidies. It exists to funnel money away from taxpayers. It’s a con built on lies like the rest. At least some people get to benefit from this, unlike people sold overhyped cars and promises of Mars colonies, but that’s changing with price hikes and service degredations too.

                • @echo64
                  link
                  English
                  31 year ago

                  What math do you want? The cost of launching infinite space ships forever is more than what subscribers pay. The satellites fall down in about a year and new ones need to be launched. The subscribers would have to pay for every single rocket launch. Right now American tax payers do.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    31 year ago

                    The problem is you say this with certainty but have no numbers or evidence to back it up. How do you know the revenue from subscribers can’t cover rocket launches?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            My evil, greedy and manipulative capitalist is better than your evil, greedy and manipulative capitalist!!!

            • @echo64
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              My point is that one is a greedy, evil businessman. The other is a greedy, evil conman.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                But only if you draw a very careful line around definitions, what musk does is very standard capitalist business and what jobs did is very much the behaviour of a classic conman. Apples whole business strategy is straight out the carnival con artist playbook, you’ll find all the same tricks at any market stall

      • no banana
        link
        English
        151 year ago

        I think it was sarcasm.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          I think that the criticism is that our system does not raise the smartest or the best to the top.

      • @4realzOP
        link
        English
        -87
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I understand where you’re coming from, but business is brutal and things like this happen in that world. PayPal (formely X .com) was also started by Elon, I don’t think he “scammed/tricked” anyone on that. And he has made billions for his investors over the years. I mean Tesla is worth over $600 billion, due to the marketing genius that is Elon. [Mistake: Elon didn’t start PayPal, just X .com]

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          67
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Man, learn something about someone before you go worshipping them.

          X was bought by paypal, but was far from “integral.” It was just its largest competitor for Confinidy at the time because Musk was washing it in money he made from a previous venture.Paypal was the more popular money transfer software, and it’s the platform the new company formed around, even taking its name.

          Musk was a actually briefly the CEO of PayPal, but his decisions were so poor that he was forced out.. He still retained enough shares of paypal to hit it big time, which is when he poured all that money into a long shot bet called Tesla, which he used goverment funds and seed capitol from his rich friends to keep alive until it turned an actual profit a decade later. With SpaceX, he leaned into fanboys like you calling him Tony stark, and managed to hire Gwynne Shotwell, a goddamn aeronautics powerhouse, as CEO the same year it was founded. She has brought SpaceX to success, by all accounts in spite of him. Its rumored that SpaceX keeps people around just to sideline Musk. That how disruptive he is to actual work. SpaceX was also utterly dependent on goverment subsides for most its existence, just like Tesla.

          Dude grew up with emerald mine money, then just kept taking outlandish risks because he had an emerald mine to keep his ass housed and fed, and yeah, eventually hit it big, with a big heaping of help from our tax dollars and mega rich pals. Big surprise.

          Turns out that if you have a wealthy life secured, you too can gamble big and make even more money. Thats how capitalism is designed to work. Capital makes more capital.

          The fact that you’re suckered in by the worlds luckiest gambler playing a game that had no actual stakes for him is sad as fuck man. Be proud of someone who overcame actual adversity. Go find a hero that wants to help people, not to rule them.

          • @4realzOP
            link
            English
            161 year ago

            Interesting, thanks for sharing. I’ll have to do some more research on Elon then.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            101 year ago

            Don’t forget blatant market manipulation. Pump&dumps on Bitcoin, doge coin, TWTR, and TSLA…

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 year ago

                  Honestly it sounds to me like there’s an effort to keep his father’s involvement in emeralds a secret.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                here it is. The whole thing seems rather murky and somewhat shady too. The most specific statement on it is this:

                Arnold’s story included answers from Errol about the mine, who said he had “very limited involvement” in it. Arnold paraphrased his answers, publishing that he said “it was a handshake deal with a Panamanian man that resulted in something like 110 emeralds up front and then a semi-regular trickle of rough stones over a few years following,” and that “there was never formal ownership.”

                The wealth earned from the investment in the mine was quantified to be about $400,000 USD, taking into account inflation when Arnold’s piece was written in 2021, according to Errol. “Errol also quoted a lower number to me over the phone,” Arnold wrote. “He also claims he was getting emeralds from other sources, with only 60-70% coming from this venture.”

                So maybe not a whole emerald mine, but like an unofficial small stake in an emerald mine? Still, 400k ain’t bad at all for a handshake deal.

        • IWantToFuckSpez
          link
          fedilink
          521 year ago

          He didn’t start PayPal. It was founded by Pieter Thiel, another billionaire christofascist, and four other guys and non of them are called Elon Musk. X.com was bought by PayPal.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            511 year ago

            It’s wild how little this dude knows about Elon musk while singing his praises to the heavens, but I guess those two things go hand in hand.

            • ZeroCool
              link
              fedilink
              English
              27
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Muskrats are always the least informed people in the room when it concerns Elon Musk. It’d be a lot funnier if it weren’t so damn easy to find the actual facts. There’s really no excusing it, they’re just willfully ignorant.

            • @FMT99
              link
              English
              261 year ago

              “Oh yeah he didn’t actually do that… Still, what a genius amirite?”

    • DarkGamer
      link
      fedilink
      1051 year ago

      I think the whole Twitter debacle has disproven that he’s a good businessman. Rather, it highlights how far one can get by having heritable wealth and being in the right place at the right time.

      • Chaotic Entropy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        He seems like the avatar of the concept that rich people are not allowed to fail in society, no matter how hard they try. Once you reach a certain size, there will always be an army of people around them to hold them up. You just sit at the top and everyone under you needs you to succeed otherwise they’re also fucked.

        Musk is too big to fail.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        I guess when you have enough money you get to try enough times that you accidentally make good choices sometimes. Or people just think he’s smart because he’s rich.

    • @Plopp
      link
      English
      291 year ago

      Being credited as something doesn’t mean you are that something. My ex credited me for having a big penis.

      Elon is not a founder of Tesla, no matter what any documents say. Calling him such when you know he isn’t makes you a liar, a fool or a co-conspirator.

      • @Mediocre_Bard
        link
        English
        101 year ago

        Now I am laughing because I am imagining you working the big penis anecdote into every comment and conversation.

        That would be a funny bit.