• Aatube
    link
    fedilink
    23
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Have you ever looked into the operating costs of having a server with music on it which over 400M monthly active users use?

    • @echo64
      link
      English
      296 months ago

      I actually work in cloud engineering and regularly price this kind of thing up.

      Their costs are salaries not aws bills.

      • @EnderMB
        link
        English
        26 months ago

        But that’s practically true of any large tech company. It’s been conventional wisdom in the tech industry for over a decade that tech is cheap, people aren’t.

        • @echo64
          link
          English
          16 months ago

          Yes. Spotify needs to figure out their burn rate for their salaries because taking more money away from artists isn’t the solution like op wants.

          • @cjsolx
            link
            English
            26 months ago

            But taking money away from employees is?

            • @echo64
              link
              English
              16 months ago

              No one is saying pay employees less. Spotify needs to figure out how to make its business work. That’s for sporify to figure out. If you think Spotify deserve more of the pie when they contribute… a download server, vs. the artists who do all the actual work, then you can honestly just fuck off. We live on totally different sides of the conversation, you want to shill for big tech, I want the artists that make the music to get paid.

    • chameleon
      link
      fedilink
      -26 months ago

      Not that high. Spotify uses some pretty tight compression (not good, just tight); most users get 96-128kbit/s AAC, premium can go a bit higher if opted in. That works out to about 16KB/s or 58MB/hour, assuming nothing’s cached.

      Bandwidth pricing very much goes down with scale, not up. But even the non-committed AWS pricing at Spotify’s scale is 2 to 3 cents/GB. You end up paying way less than that with any kind of commitment and AWS isn’t the cheapest around to begin with.