• @Zombiepirate
    link
    511 months ago

    The really funny part is that you think you’re tricking anyone.

    You know you’re lying, but you do it anyway.

    Like I said, even Throwaway admitted it was a White Nationalist publication, although he upvoted your White Nationalist apologetics. Wonder what that’s about?

    • SatansMaggotyCumFart
      link
      411 months ago

      I wouldn’t waste too much time with this particular poster as they like to make insane assertions and run away when their narrative starts to crumble only to post another and try again.

        • SatansMaggotyCumFart
          link
          511 months ago

          You can start with answering this comment from five hours ago on this thread that you’ve ignored so far:

          "

          Conservatives have utterly betrayed that principle by supporting massive violations of rights such as Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid programs, central banking, government-run schools, welfare programs, the “war on drugs,” the progressive tax code, regulations on businesses, subsidies for infrastructure projects, and on and on. Such entitlements and regulatory controls are clear instances of socialist and fascist policies… I’d suggest you spend a bit of time learning some history if this is the type of article you use to support that insane statement."

          Or this from two day ago that you never responded to, just moved on to other posts.

          "The names you listed are disgraced, in jail or dead but the big name conservatives don’t seem to suffer any consequences from their peers.

          I’m also not claiming that any group of people have universal characteristics and I’m interested in hearing why you think they do."

          • NeuromancerOPM
            link
            fedilink
            -611 months ago

            I say what I need to say and move it. If the argument from the opposing person is senseless or weak, I move on.

            I don’t know of conservatives that do as claimed. So how can I respond to something so generic? So I don’t.

            And your comment has nothing to do with the topic. So I ignored it.

            Maybe the issue is people ask off topic or silly things trying to “win” and that’s why I don’t respond. You didn’t catch my interest.

              • NeuromancerOPM
                link
                fedilink
                -611 months ago

                What that you brought up something off topic and I decided to ignore it? If you don’t state something interesting or relevant, you can’t expect people to respond to you. Nobody owes you a response to irreverent statements.

                  • NeuromancerOPM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -411 months ago

                    The whole citation talking about conservatives. The topic was democrats and their strong association to fascism. It’s a well known tie. You didn’t dispute the book or the book review. You tried to talk about something else that was off topic and I ignored it.

                    If you want to go off topic, most people will ignore it.

    • ThrowawayM
      link
      fedilink
      -711 months ago

      Rule 1, be excellent to each other, civility, namecalling, sealioning, being an asshole in general.

      Due to your general history of being an ass, and the fact you already got warned Zombie, I’m handing out a ban.

      On a somewhat related note, I vote on nearly everything in this community. It helps me keep track of what I looked at.

      And I’m making a list of who I already warned, so I don’t have through 19 pages of my own comment history to find where I warned you.