WashedOver to Lemmy Shitpost • 1 year agoAre you sure it's not because you're under 6' tall?lemmy.caimagemessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up1371arrow-down15
arrow-up1366arrow-down1imageAre you sure it's not because you're under 6' tall?lemmy.caWashedOver to Lemmy Shitpost • 1 year agomessage-square8fedilink
minus-squareWashedOverOPlinkfedilink6•1 year agoBack when I dated this was a big deal. I suspect this height requirement to get on the rides still hasn’t really changed all these years later. I do think they have requested the deletion of the weight requirements though…
minus-squarekamenLady.link3•1 year agoAt the same time they brought in the money requirement though or was it always there?
minus-square@Jyrdanolink1•edit-21 year agoThe biggest reason to ditch imperial and go metric. 5’11” short vs 180cm tall 6ft tall vs 183cm try hard
5’11 vibes
Back when I dated this was a big deal. I suspect this height requirement to get on the rides still hasn’t really changed all these years later. I do think they have requested the deletion of the weight requirements though…
At the same time they brought in the money requirement though or was it always there?
Oh yes the ooga booga rides!
The biggest reason to ditch imperial and go metric.
5’11” short vs 180cm tall
6ft tall vs 183cm try hard
metric isn’t funny like imperial so no