CNN — Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss, the two Georgia election workers who won a nearly $150 million verdict against Rudy Giuliani for defamation on Friday, have sued him again, asking a federal judge to permanently prohibit him from lying about them.

The lawsuit comes as Giuliani has continued to make false statements about their work as absentee ballot counters in the 2020 election.

  • @meco03211
    link
    10
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I’m curious what remedy there is for someone defaming you that’s broke. Imagine Rudy getting sued into bankruptcy. On paper, he could have no assets and no income but mooching off the rich fucks still shielding him. What’s to stop him from defaming people then?

      • @shalafi
        link
        English
        26 months ago

        We did away with debtor’s prisons long ago.

        • @assassin_aragorn
          link
          16 months ago

          I think you could jail him still for the original offense and not have it be a debt issue. The court finds him guilty for defamation, but he has no assets to sell, so he’s sentenced to jail time instead.

          • @shalafi
            link
            English
            26 months ago

            Jail him for defamation, I’m sure it can carry a sentence, but not because he can’t pay. We’re back to debtor’s prisons in that case.

    • @TheJims
      link
      56 months ago

      Since Rudy is such a proponent perhaps Trial by Combat? Ruby vs Rudy cage match.

      • @neanderthal
        link
        26 months ago

        Match him right and maybe it could be like The Viper and the Mountain.

        Rudy vs Alex

    • @PM_Your_Nudes_Please
      link
      46 months ago

      That’s called being “judgement proof”. It’s not an established legal thing, but it’s something lawyers will jokingly refer to. Because they know that even if they successfully get a judgement against the offender, there’s zero chance of actually collecting the judgement. No assets and no income? Good luck collecting on that million dollar judgement, because the court’s actual methods of recourse are limited.

      You could potentially put a lien on their assets, so you claim the value if they ever sell. But if they have no assets, there’s nothing to put a lien on. You could potentially garnish their wages. But if they have no income, there’s nothing to garnish.

      • @hydrospanner
        link
        26 months ago

        Honestly at this point with Rudy, seize and sell the fucking clothes off his back and the pen in his pocket. Throw him in an orange jumpsuit and off to jail with him after that.