• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    34
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Technically this is discrimination based on age.

    They were born 4/20/(year). You could make an argument they are discriminating all people exactly (X) years, 4 months, and 2 days old.

    • @CleoTheWizard
      link
      English
      511 months ago

      Yeah we typically thing age discrimination is saying we only hire people between 20-40y/o but it would also cover it if you said “I won’t hire someone 21 years old only” and still applies to banning someone 21.5 years old. And 21 years and 6 months and 27 days old.

      Same applies if I ban anyone with an age divisible by 3. It’s a group of people, but if their age has anything to do with why you aren’t hiring them then I’d say this applies.

      • @davidgro
        link
        English
        011 months ago

        No, the comment was written on the 18th so 2 days. The 4 months only matches because this is December.

        • Darth_Mew
          link
          English
          111 months ago

          wtf does the comment date have to do with April being the (4th) month and the (20th) being the 20th day of the month?

          • @davidgro
            link
            English
            0
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Because how old someone is is relative to the current time. And that’s the wording that the commenter used: People who are x years, y months, and z days old. The next day those same people will be a day older.

            Say the discrimination was about people born on Dec 20 instead of April, in that case they (where I am) are currently X years, 11 months, and 30 days old, and tomorrow is their birthday.

            I just realized that they did calculate it the wrong direction though, the 4/20 peeps are 3 months and 30 or 29 days old today (not sure on that) today.