• @rockSlayer
    link
    69 months ago

    Ok, that doesn’t make it better though.

    • @schmidtster
      link
      -13
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      It shows people are getting mad just because someone endorsing piracy got their comeuppance instead of what actually matters.

      • @rockSlayer
        link
        109 months ago

        Just to be clear, you’re ok with saddling a disabled person with $14m dollar fine to a multibillion dollar corporation, for the crime of making $300k on a device that allows you to do what you want with your device? It wasn’t specifically meant for piracy, there are several good and legitimate reasons to have full control of your device.

        • @schmidtster
          link
          -39 months ago

          What does the person being disabled have to do with anything?

          • @rockSlayer
            link
            5
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Because he lives in the US Canada, where it’s expensive as fuck to just exist as a disabled person.

            • StametsOP
              link
              5
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              He actually lives in Canada. Your comment still applies overall as it is not feasible to live adequately on disability here but he’s not in the US.

              • @rockSlayer
                link
                49 months ago

                I’m a little confused, because he served time in a US prison. How did that happen?

                • StametsOP
                  link
                  79 months ago

                  Canadians serving in US Prisons isn’t unheard of. We do have an extradition treaty to the US. Not one that I’m okay with as fuck being beholden to American laws while never stepping foot in the country. However he wasn’t even in Canada. He was in the Dominican Republic at the time that he was caught. He was extradited from there to the United States where he served 2 years before being released and repatriated back to Canada.

            • @schmidtster
              link
              -6
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Person is in Canada and has disability insurance as well as government benefits. Unless the articles are wrong in saying disability insurance.

              Still don’t see how it’s relevant to the story about being fined. Would be the same story for anyone disability or not.

              • @rockSlayer
                link
                39 months ago

                OP corrected me, and I edited my comment to reflect the correction. Still don’t see how it’s weird to be upset about a company fining the everliving fuck out of a private citizen because the company is anti-ownership.

                • @schmidtster
                  link
                  -3
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Because this group actively endorsed and profited from piracy. They made it a job instead of a hobby. Don’t profit from it, that’s like the one thing you don’t do, and they did it.

                  Not really a private citizen anymore at that point if you’re making a business.

                  • @rockSlayer
                    link
                    59 months ago

                    Ok, so Nintendo should sue the group/company he was a part of and not the individual. The device was for hacking/modding. The fact that pirates used it too is incidental. Nintendo ships games in which you can’t even play 4/5 of the game due to a game breaking bug. The only way to access the rest of the game is to mod your ds to get past the bug. There’s also software preservation aspects so we don’t lose our digital history.

                    Honestly, fuck Nintendo. You don’t own software even if you buy it, so I’d argue that it’s not theft to use software without paying. But I digress.