@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • edit-21 year agoi <3 statisticsmander.xyzimagemessage-square93fedilinkarrow-up1747arrow-down126file-text
arrow-up1721arrow-down1imagei <3 statisticsmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • edit-21 year agomessage-square93fedilinkfile-text
Disclaimer: This is a joke. Ecofascism is obviously bad, kids. Don’t be that guy. https://theconversation.com/8-billion-people-why-trying-to-control-the-population-is-often-futile-and-harmful-194369
minus-squareDeceptichumlinkfedilink-1•1 year agoMate, it’s not tankie to acknowledge that we use far more resources per person compared to the rest of the world.
minus-square@HerrBeterlinkEnglish2•edit-21 year agoYeah, but cost of living differs. Nonetheless, killing people without attributing the actual cause of pollution to the polluters (companies, private or state controlled) is meaningless. Production will kill us all
minus-squareDeceptichumlinkfedilink1•1 year agoKilling people for the environment is fucking stupid, agreed. I’m not in favour of OPs picture.
Mate, it’s not tankie to acknowledge that we use far more resources per person compared to the rest of the world.
The rich far outweigh the plebians
It only takes ~30k USD to be in the global top 5%.
Yeah, but cost of living differs. Nonetheless, killing people without attributing the actual cause of pollution to the polluters (companies, private or state controlled) is meaningless.
Production will kill us all
Killing people for the environment is fucking stupid, agreed.
I’m not in favour of OPs picture.