🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣

TLDR - First few sentences

Christian Science does not agree with the theory that morals grow out of people’s behavior. It stands firmly on the ground that morals for mankind are derived from the divine Mind, God, and that they are therefore ageless. Morally right behavior pertaining to sex was revealed by Moses.

  • flatearth
    link
    fedilink
    -3
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So your body controls you?
    You cannot use your will?

    • @FabioTheNewOrder
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      Absolutely not, it is my will to reply to your nonsensical comments to highlight how deranged they are to future readers.

      Also, can you prove to be provided if free will in a universe which seems to be ruled by deterministic factors? Welcome to modern philosophy :)

      • flatearth
        link
        fedilink
        -3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Can we say LGBTQ+ are deranged?
        Those who willingly reject God first in this world, will be rejected by Him in the next.

        • @FabioTheNewOrder
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          No, we cannot.

          The “natural behaviour” argument also bear no weight to the discussion since homosexual intercourse is well documented in a number of animal species thus rendering this a “natural” act as many others.

          Hope to have made myself clear

          • flatearth
            link
            fedilink
            -21 year ago

            LGBTQ+ (which you are part of) are deranged.
            It is a disorder (even if seen in a number of animal species).
            You cannot distinguish between right and wrong (even if seen in a number of animal species).

            • @FabioTheNewOrder
              link
              English
              31 year ago

              Well, at least I don’t use people’ sexual preferences, which they cannot choose, to be a dick to them. I can see what’s right and wrong there while you clearly can’t.

              Happy holidays once more I presume