• iAmTheTot
    link
    fedilink
    351 year ago

    What are y’all searching for that Google search isn’t working for you anymore? Like, genuinely, I’m baffled by this.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      601 year ago

      A typical example is more popular searches crowding out actual answers to your question.

      I have had this a lot of times with IT problems, I am a sys admin and google a ton of things related to my job. But 5 out of 10 times some keyword will relate to a simple problem many people have with their pc and all relative answers to my exact question get drowned out.

      Google anything related to ‘laptop monitor turn off’ and you will only find results telling you how to turn of sleep when you close the lid. No matter how much syntaxing or formatting you do with your search

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        331 year ago

        I’m not even a sysadmin, just a power user and this infuriates me to no end. I gave up on a search just a couple days ago because I kept getting bottom tier answers. Like thanks but I already know how to use my computer, now tell me how to fix this problem.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        C’mon now. “Laptop monitor turn off” has never generated a good result, even in the before time. I share the question: what are these people searching for that Google is generally yielding worse results than other engines? For anything sysadmin, IT-related, or any sort of troubleshooting, I’ve always needed to be creative to get to the good stuff.

        • @micka190
          link
          211 year ago

          C’mon now. “Laptop monitor turn off” has never generated a good result

          That’s not what they’re saying. They mean that if your search contains that or is somewhat adjacent (despite being more specific), your results will be drowned in it. For example, if you had something like “laptop monitor turn off when bla bla bla”, 90% of the results will completely ignore what you’ve added.

          I’ve got to deal with the same shit whenever I have to deal with complicated programming questions. Half the results will be related to some really basic mistake on the user’s side that I haven’t done, and I’ll need to spend a lot of time trying to find the magical word combination that doesn’t trigger those non-related issues and actually show me what I need.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -31 year ago

            Yeah, and what I was saying is it’s always been that way since the first search engines started popping up.

            • @scottywh
              link
              -21 year ago

              Stupid searches yield stupid results

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -31 year ago

        You’re a Systems Administrator, but Google Tier 2 issues, do you provide break fix support? I thought as a SA you would be working behind the scenes on systems (apps), servers, etc.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          Can’t speak for the person you’re replying to, but I’m a security engineer and stuff still makes its way to me that you would think would get filtered out by others (and isn’t my job to fix). It just takes the right person thinking “this is obviously a problem with $system, let’s just send it straight over to them so they can fix it quickly!” And then we get the fun job of proving it’s not us and has no relation to us.

          We got a ticket today for packet loss between two systems, neither of which have any of our tools on them…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            I think this is a training issue that needs to be resolved at the Helpdesk level. I understand that nobody is perfect but if you keep seeing tickets like that - Helpdesk managers need to update their training modules and start tweaking the Helpdesk system to have service requests go to the proper groups. Incident tickets are another story but that’s where the training comes in.

    • Doctor xNo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Torrents, modded apk’s,…

      Check out my results for some chinese download service called “Content Plaza” for example:

      Google:

      Yandex:

      Like, 2? On the ‘entire’ internet? 2? Right…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        111 year ago

        Was Yandex respecting your query there?

        Added quotation marks for “terabox” as well, and it was fascinating across providers:

        Yandex agreed with your Google search…

        …but not mine:

        DDG coming in with one result:

        Startpage, just one result?!

        …nope, not from the “mobile site”:

        Bing didn’t care about those silly quotation marks, here are a thousand results:

        • Doctor xNo
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yet if I enter something like ‘resolv’ in Google I need to add ‘-resolve’ to not get hundreds of unrelated results… Same goes for any not-too-popular software that is named a slight misspelling of their purpose… I even find it ridiculous how often first results litterally say underneath they did not contain your query…

          But with terabox and “content plaza” it gives 2 results?

          Startpage I have no idea, but I’m guessing they, like many, use the Google API for webcrawler results… 1 result? Those are pretty common words,…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      131 year ago

      Google straight up lies to me about movies an actor has been in, almost every time. “Wow, I had no idea Robert Downey Jr was in Mean Girls! Who did he play?” checks imdb “no he fuckin wasn’t wtf google” (this is an arbitrary example I just made up because I don’t feel like finding a real one right now)

      • @TrickDacy
        link
        21 year ago

        That is a dumb feature that shouldn’t be trusted.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          I mean if they got it right it would be a handy feature lol, but yes it clearly can’t be trusted so I stopped bothering

          • @TrickDacy
            link
            21 year ago

            Right. I just think it was overly ambitious. It’s right just enough to earn trust and wrong just enough to burn you. I had a really, really dumb argument once because of that feature

          • iAmTheTot
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Is he not slated for season two? I thought that robot he voiced was going to be in it, I remember reading some article months ago though I admit I only have a passing interest in the show.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              41 year ago

              I see speculation but nothing solid. I think google is pulling from the rumors, which it really shouldn’t. If he is slated then that’s fine, let me know if you find anything

              • iAmTheTot
                link
                fedilink
                -21 year ago

                I don’t actually care enough to go looking into it, I was just mentioning what I remember reading.

                  • iAmTheTot
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -21 year ago

                    Me not caring enough to confirm if Alan Tudyk is going to be in the second season of a show I haven’t even watched is not a good excuse for you to just make up shit to try to make a point.

    • Deceptichum
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Everything.

      They fucked up the magic sauce, now exact searches reveal similar topics it thinks(paid) you might want to look at.

      It basically adds its own keywords into your results to direct you to what it wants you to see instead.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      I use DDG and if the result is not what I’m looking for, I add !g to forward the query to Google.

      80% of the times, I need to add !g because DDG is clueless.

      I wish I could say otherwise but Google search results are still better overall than DDG.

      Sure, for some specific thematics, DDG will do better. But that’s for quite niche subjects.

      Very surprised to see people talk about DDG like it’s at the same level or better than Google.

    • @3ntranced
      link
      11 year ago

      I made the switch to DDG a few days ago and it actually is insane how much more relevant the information is compared to google.

    • @TrickDacy
      link
      -21 year ago

      The latest in hipster rants. apparently not easy to find on Google ;)