• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    611 months ago

    That still sounds like a special type of third person, though I guess that’s just disagreeing about terminology.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      111 months ago

      I see why you would analyze it that way but I also see that it deserves a term in its own rights. As you said, it’s all terminology. There are no objective definitions, at least not in linguistics