Idk, it sure sounds to me like this person thinks this album cover is equivalent to child porn. If I’m wrong I’m sorry, I’ve just seen a lot of weird prudes think a naked baby is sexual and should never be seen by anyone ever
I think the meaning was ‘entire books of kid nudes aren’t restricted because existing laws, so there is no way such a cover would’ and tbh we think we’re all on the same page by thinking the case around this cover is complete bullshit
That’s prob a good explanation, I should give them the benefit of the doubt and not just get aggressive over misinterpreted stuff :c again sorry kadu if that wasn’t your intent, you’re definitely right I agree, this seems like a ridiculous and not legally justified thing to stir up shit about every few years, but idk a lot of the context so maybe this person is a victim of some kind of abuse for all I know (other than stuff experienced by a lot of child stars, which they might’ve wound up being Idk)
I don’t think that the comment you reply to intended this, yours looks like a silly strawman
Idk, it sure sounds to me like this person thinks this album cover is equivalent to child porn. If I’m wrong I’m sorry, I’ve just seen a lot of weird prudes think a naked baby is sexual and should never be seen by anyone ever
I think the meaning was ‘entire books of kid nudes aren’t restricted because existing laws, so there is no way such a cover would’ and tbh we think we’re all on the same page by thinking the case around this cover is complete bullshit
That’s prob a good explanation, I should give them the benefit of the doubt and not just get aggressive over misinterpreted stuff :c again sorry kadu if that wasn’t your intent, you’re definitely right I agree, this seems like a ridiculous and not legally justified thing to stir up shit about every few years, but idk a lot of the context so maybe this person is a victim of some kind of abuse for all I know (other than stuff experienced by a lot of child stars, which they might’ve wound up being Idk)
deleted by creator