Idk, it sure sounds to me like this person thinks this album cover is equivalent to child porn. If I’m wrong I’m sorry, I’ve just seen a lot of weird prudes think a naked baby is sexual and should never be seen by anyone ever
I think the meaning was ‘entire books of kid nudes aren’t restricted because existing laws, so there is no way such a cover would’ and tbh we think we’re all on the same page by thinking the case around this cover is complete bullshit
That’s prob a good explanation, I should give them the benefit of the doubt and not just get aggressive over misinterpreted stuff :c again sorry kadu if that wasn’t your intent, you’re definitely right I agree, this seems like a ridiculous and not legally justified thing to stir up shit about every few years, but idk a lot of the context so maybe this person is a victim of some kind of abuse for all I know (other than stuff experienced by a lot of child stars, which they might’ve wound up being Idk)
Idk, it sure sounds to me like this person thinks this album cover is equivalent to child porn. If I’m wrong I’m sorry, I’ve just seen a lot of weird prudes think a naked baby is sexual and should never be seen by anyone ever
I think the meaning was ‘entire books of kid nudes aren’t restricted because existing laws, so there is no way such a cover would’ and tbh we think we’re all on the same page by thinking the case around this cover is complete bullshit
That’s prob a good explanation, I should give them the benefit of the doubt and not just get aggressive over misinterpreted stuff :c again sorry kadu if that wasn’t your intent, you’re definitely right I agree, this seems like a ridiculous and not legally justified thing to stir up shit about every few years, but idk a lot of the context so maybe this person is a victim of some kind of abuse for all I know (other than stuff experienced by a lot of child stars, which they might’ve wound up being Idk)
deleted by creator