More than 200 Substack authors asked the platform to explain why it’s “platforming and monetizing Nazis,” and now they have an answer straight from co-founder Hamish McKenzie:

I just want to make it clear that we don’t like Nazis either—we wish no-one held those views. But some people do hold those and other extreme views. Given that, we don’t think that censorship (including through demonetizing publications) makes the problem go away—in fact, it makes it worse.

While McKenzie offers no evidence to back these ideas, this tracks with the company’s previous stance on taking a hands-off approach to moderation. In April, Substack CEO Chris Best appeared on the Decoder podcast and refused to answer moderation questions. “We’re not going to get into specific ‘would you or won’t you’ content moderation questions” over the issue of overt racism being published on the platform, Best said. McKenzie followed up later with a similar statement to the one today, saying “we don’t like or condone bigotry in any form.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What does Substack plan to do with the profits that it makes from hosting Nazi content?

    • @NotMyOldRedditName
      link
      English
      19
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Advertise in hopes of luring in more of that sweet sweet nazi fascism money.

    • @masquenox
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      I’m just guessing here, but those Swiss bankers are still as fond of hiding nazis’ ill-gotten gains for them as ever…